rsd1200
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2016
- Messages
- 11,477
- Reaction score
- 30,747
I agree, the timing of the killings so soon after the birth of HMR's baby seems deliberate. I think it was probably noted by LE when investigating the crime, and strengthened the theory that the whole massacre was centered on HMR.
I don't know anything about paternity testing in Ohio, could JW have forced HMR to get a paternity test on her baby? My sense is, likely not. Note that paternity tests can be done on unborn babies, and she refused to do that and just left the father's name off the birth certificate. She likely didn't want to share custody with whomever was the father, and had probably been assured by her family that she wouldn't need child support.
The W's might have been determined not to miss out on a moment of this child's life if she was, in fact, JWs. In fact, they were facing the likelihood that they might never have any contact with 'their' child at all. The conflict between HMR/JW and therefore the families could have been as much centred on paternity testing this baby, as on custody of SW, since they began planning the massacre when HMR was about 4 months pregnant, ie around the time JW may have learned of it.
I'm not so sure that he even thought the baby was his, but, they did possibly draw the line at killing infants who could not speak nor identify them (dogs would fit here too). So far, he's the only one who has said that there was a chance the baby was his, and he's the only one left alive who would know that for sure. Did she send JW an ultrasound pic? I've never seen him post one. CG still had his copy posted at last check. I mean, really, he could tell LE; How could the potential father, of a newborn, murder his child(ren)'s Momma, in cold blood, while that newborn slept beside her Momma?!
I've a feeling that if anyone will fold, it will be JW, who folds first.