Marilynilpa
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2005
- Messages
- 5,165
- Reaction score
- 1,201
Going with my feeling that she knew her abductor, we would need to know more about the people around her (her friends, co-workers, neighbors, school friends, priest, etc.), which I don't think would be an easy task since so much time has passed. Maybe in the case file it would have a listing of everyone interviewed....As for the man on the motorcycle who said he thought he saw her arguing with a male in a car and a red shoe flew out the window of said car, do we know if the motorcycle was traveling along side the car, parked on the road watching the car, travelling behind the car, etc.? If the motorcycle was travelling along with the car, the witness could have easily been off on his description as to the spot where the shoe flew out the window. And if the shoe flew out the window into a bushy, grassy spot along the road, and they did not have the correct area, it would be plausible that the shoe was never found. Searching for a body in heavy underbrush is tricky - never mind one small shoe...
Just some thoughts,
Creole
A couple of years ago I had an opportunity to look at Lola's case file. From what I could tell, LE talked to everyone in the neighborhood, Lola's friends and acquaintances, literally hundreds of people.
I think Lola got into a car with someone she knew, someone who after her disappearance seemed completely above suspicion. I have no idea who that person might be. I located her high school yearbook, jotted down the names of males she went to school with, as well as male teachers, and searched those names to see if any of them had later been arrested for sexual assault, kidnapping, etc., to no avail.
As for the red shoe, I think that was nothing more than a coincidence.