Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don’t think there was any crime at all.This is my theory.
A jealous fight broke out that night and someone or someones hit Noah in the head with a golf club and/or butt of a firearm, which killed him.
They then ran over him with the ATV, causing the other catastrophic injuries, and dumped him by the side of the road hoping it would be deemed a hit and run.
Any thoughts?
I don’t think there was any crime at all.
I think he was drunk and went for a walk after that ATV accident. He may have had internal injuries from the rollover, or the alcohol alone got him. He passes out in the road, and is then hit by a large vehicle.
He wasn’t wearing clothes at the time, so the person who hit him may have thought they ran over a deer or something.
That explains the broken teeth, the scalp injury, the road rash, etc.
It's not a hit and run with this scenario, and you're correct in that the injuries absolutely do not support a hit and run. Laying in the road and being hit by an unsuspecting driver, is not the definition of a hit and run. Typically victims are standing, and the driver knows what they did.Except. The authorities have pretty definitively said it was not a hit and run.
It's not a hit and run with this scenario, and you're correct in that the injuries absolutely do not support a hit and run. Laying in the road and being hit by an unsuspecting driver, is not the definition of a hit and run. Typically victims are standing, and the driver knows what they did.
I’ve followed this from the very first post here. I’ve read the autopsy report, the witness accounts, viewed that social media garbage, and listened to multiple pathologists who have described similar scenarios to what I described.All due respect, there are many aspects of this case that you are not taking into account.
I’ve followed this from the very first post here. I’ve read the autopsy report, the witness accounts, viewed that social media garbage, and listened to multiple pathologists who have described similar scenarios to what I described.
A murder makes no sense, while an accident makes a great deal of sense.
This has become a social media cesspool of rumors, and I think it’s horrific that innocent people are being accused of committing a crime that there’s no evidence even occurred.
A bunch of drunken kids who had no idea what was going on at the time.So what do you make of the wildly conflicting accounts provided by people who were there?
And yet. He was found naked. Not in those different clothes.He goes for a walk, wearing different clothes thanks to the atv accident, and different shoes because he couldn’t find his (I’ve done the shoe thing myself),
He was drunk, and maybe he was waving the shorts around or something. Maybe they were loose, and slid off when he was being dragged. It's not a dealbreaker for me. If you're staging an accident, you make sure he's fully dressed, so in a way it helps the argument that it wasn't murder.And yet. He was found naked. Not in those different clothes.
But the shoes were still on his feet. So...he was hit with a large vehicle that removed his clothes yet left the shoes on his feet intact?
He was drunk, and maybe he was waving the shorts around or something. Maybe they were loose, and slid off when he was being dragged. It's not a dealbreaker for me. If you're staging an accident, you make sure he's fully dressed, so in a way it helps the argument that it wasn't murder.
If he was wearing the shorts, they could have slid off without removing his shoes, anyway.
If he was wearing the shorts, they could have slid off without removing his shoes, anyway.