I am trying to digest this new info and turning it over in my mind a bit, so bear with me...
If Sharon was a "cousin" to this purported witness, and she suddenly went missing while in her uncle's care, wouldn't the parents/in-laws still have likely reported it to authorities?
Or here are a few other scenarios:
The Pedophile/Father to the witness would have to be lying about the familial relationship and the child was just another kidnap victim (who still would have likely been reported missing)
OR, the Pedophile would have had to silence/ kill the parents (but there is still the likelihood their family members would have reported all of them missing)
OR, one or both of the parents/in-laws would have been in league with the Pedophile and were not concerned with "Sharon" suddenly disappearing with one of his buddies.
those situations, while possible, still seem highly unlikely... However, if "Sharon" was a sister to the witness, that would make more sense, because if she suddenly disappeared with Floyd, the Father/Pedophile would have to weigh the risk of reporting Floyd as a kidnapper only to be outed as a murderer/pedophile in retaliation.
The mystery of "Sharon" is so confounding, but if there is even a grain of truth to anything Floyd said, the "drug addict/prostitute mom" still makes the most sense-- that a drug addicted, or mentally challenged, or mentally unstable mother fell for Floyd's con game and willingly gave the child to him, and then never looked back.