Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
and why would the step dad, or real dad, or the moms boyfriend (whatever he is) have to kill the dog--and why move your own dead dog? Maybe the dog was severely injured, stabbed, then maybe ran until he died??
and why would the step dad, or real dad, or the moms boyfriend (whatever he is) have to kill the dog--and why move your own dead dog? Maybe the dog was severely injured, stabbed, then maybe ran until he died??
Which is another thing that might point away from the stepdad. He would have had to go away and hidden the bloody clothing somewhere. And there is going to be DNA evidence left with the girl. So it was probably NOT him. I jumped to an angry conclusion because this whole thing is just so UGLY>
there is DNA in there, there has to be. there is NO control in that scene. there is SOMETHING in there to lead them in a direction. I am sure of it.
She was naked from the waist down but I never heard that her clothes were actually missing. Just weren't on her.
The dog was killed then it's body was thrown behind another trailer. Makes me think the dog was putting up a fuss and the boyfriend got rid of the body so mom would not see it when she came home. He could claim it was just missing. The dog probably put up a fuss when the little girl was being hurt. The window that is broken has glass outside and a table blocking the entrance/exit. It is all pointing to the boyfriend to me.
link regarding the dog:
http://api.viglink.com/api/click?fo...-old-sapulpa&jsonp=vglnk_jsonp_13338541750913
She was naked from the waist down but I never heard that her clothes were actually missing. Just weren't on her.
.... meant have to hide HIS own bloody clothing, I believe, not the childs clothing.
@ mysteriew: I didnt think the "baby" (4 is not a baby IMO) was carried anywhere, what makes you think that?
.... meant have to hide HIS own bloody clothing, I believe, not the childs clothing.
@ mysteriew: I didnt think the "baby" (4 is not a baby IMO) was carried anywhere, what makes you think that?
There was no one there but him and the children. Why would he care that the dog made a fuss? Why take the chance of running into someone while carrying a dead dog around outside? If you were going to say that an intruder harmed the child, why not say the intruder must have killed the dog, so why hide it?