Forgive me this is rambly!
After much thought and obsessing over this case, I think I have a few points that we should discuss. I believe that these people were transient. I was kind of thrown off by the rings, but they don't seem like high end rings and the fact that hers doesn't have TW stamped tells me that they aren't actually a match. They didn't have shoes on. This confuses me. In the transient train hopping world, are shoes a commodity?? Or possibly was it a SK and he collected shoes? I don't think so. I think the shoes were stolen. The reasons I believe they were transients are: His tattoos are home made. Her pants and panties don't match. They aren't really even a close match. Her brand of pullover seems to me to be something picked up at a goodwill as it is made in south Africa and they were never sold in the states. His jeans don't make sense either. His waist was 31 and length was 34. at an estimated 5'7-5'9 those jeans are much too long. he wouldn't have been sagging because they were tight at the waist and long in the leg. They were close to the train tracks and there is a switchover in mcalister. I could find nobody missing in the surrounding states that match so I think they were train hoppers. Has anyone looked at Anthony Horner as possibly him? He was known to frequent homeless shelters from a young age. I can't find a picture of the "R" tattoo but the eye and the cross are very crude. Also, the cross is really poorly done, it seems more like an x or a part of a swastika. The matching watches and semi matched rings could all have been stolen or picked up from a pawn shop. Thoughts?