It doesn't matter what the officer thought. It is his responsibility to uphold the court order, which stated that Wrangler had custody of his children.I wouldn't read too much into what one cop told Rickman. He could have just said it snidely because of Rickman's prior arrests, including that on Feb. 21, Rickman was arrested and charged with Domestic Assault and Battery in the Presence of Minors and Public Intoxication, which prompted the district attorney to ask the court to revoke Rickman’s probation. The charge was for attacking his mother in law.
If Tifany or the officer disagreed with the court order, then it is their responsibility to go back to court and apply to change the custody arrangement. They did not have the authority to refuse to abide by the court order. The officer made a bad choice, and officers like that may have emboldened Tifany in thinking that the law didn't apply to her.