Trino
Well-Known Member
Anyone suppose drugs is involved? OK legislature in Feb 2024 was considering a fentanyl act - don't know much about it or if it passed.
It's also possible the grandmother doesn't know anything.If the grandmother isn’t talking, they may not know when the women were last seen. They know when they left to pick up the children, but maybe they do not yet know if someone saw them after that.
I agree.Definitely the public needs to be involved. Maybe a stray car was somehow seen and can be identified.
And then there are those where people will do anything to maintain custody or obtain custody! The Rhoden -Gilley family is testament of that! 8 family members died in 4 different locations, all over custody of a 3 year old little girl…It's also possible the grandmother doesn't know anything.
I haven't read all the court docs to have any opinion on any of the parties involved but there have been countless numbers of really awful custody cases that don't end up with one side of the family doing something unthinkable and/or criminal.
jmo
Think I'll go check it out.Mea Culpa mods, I had totally missed this announcement and so was unaware. I thought I was sharing an approved MSM article.
fox-news-national-is-no-longer-an-approved-source.676581/
I thought the car was found by Butler's husband/fiance as reported yesterday. Do we know which is correct?OSBI spokesman Hunter states that the car was found by a sheriffs deputy. OSBI obviously knows way more than they are saying, but they don’t want to share it with the public because that’s also sharing it with their suspect(s). They aren’t asking for tips because they don’t need them. MOO
IMO we know what time the court order stated visitation for VB to start, so count back the time it takes to drive to the meeting spot and that’s likely the time they left their house.
Sloppy reporting has muddied the waters. It went from deputies found the car, to the fiancé found the car surrounded by deputies and now news agencies saying the fiancé found the car first.I thought the car was found by Butler's husband/fiance as reported yesterday. Do we know which is correct?
Not that it really matters other than there may be other more pertinent examples of misreporting.
Our news reporters leave much to be desired these days. Whatever happened to verifying facts before reporting?Sloppy reporting has muddied the waters. It went from deputies found the car, to the fiancé found the car surrounded by deputies and now news agencies saying the fiancé found the car first.
Would we be on the same page to think that an interview with the children could clear this up? Either they were aware of the visitation and party, and were taken to the meet-up place, or they weren't. If they never left home that day, that would be make everything obvious, in my opinion.I may be wrong, but I’m thinking premeditated.
Sadly that is true. I'm sure most of us could rattle off all sorts of sick and heartbreaking cases where terrible things took place and innocent people lost their lives.And then there are those where people will do anything to maintain custody or obtain custody! The Rhoden -Gilley family is testament of that! 8 family members died in 4 different locations, all over custody of a 3 year old little girl…
They could have gone though and waited with gma until they turned around after the no show.Would we be on the same page to think that an interview with the children could clear this up? Either they were aware of the visitation and party, and were taken to the meet-up place, or they weren't. If they never left home that day, that would be make everything obvious, in my opinion.
If you're not first, you're last now. Moose out front should have told you. I miss the greatest generation.Our news reporters leave much to be desired these days. Whatever happened to verifying facts before reporting?
That's always possible. This may turn out to be an Occam's razor fallacy. The simplest, most obvious explanation may not be actuality.So everyone thinking this is tied to VB and her custody situation but what if it's tied to JK somehow?
If premeditation was involved, I'd think they would have gone to the meeting place for "appearances sake", knowing full well there would be questions afterwards.Would we be on the same page to think that an interview with the children could clear this up? Either they were aware of the visitation and party, and were taken to the meet-up place, or they weren't. If they never left home that day, that would be make everything obvious, in my opinion.