Onfortuneswheel
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2016
- Messages
- 252
- Reaction score
- 434
@Hochman I think you have a bit more ability than me in the realm of reconstructing from a skull - would this case be up your alley?I wonder if a reconstruction could be made from the photos of her skull.
Yeah, i have a book with instructions for placing tissue depth markers on skulls. However if i attempt a reconstruction, it'll very likely be inaccurate since...@Hochman I think you have a bit more ability than me in the realm of reconstructing from a skull - would this case be up your alley?
Note that her head is slight turned to the left, not facing forwards.This is pretty inaccurate. This will likely look NOTHING like the individual in life. Perspective has also been fixed.
View attachment 341666
Compare with HEAVY caution.
(EDIT: fixed misspelling)
I dislike this recon, might improve it tomorrow.This is pretty inaccurate. This will likely look NOTHING like the individual in life. Perspective has also been fixed.
View attachment 341666
Compare with HEAVY caution.
(EDIT: fixed misspelling)
I dislike this recon, might improve it tomorrow.
The shading is really weird, but for a recon with estimated tissue depth I feel it's somewhat enough to make a comparison. Eventually I'll get around to fixing the shading and doing etc features.Speaking as an artist, not a forensic scientist--Nice job. The nose and cheekbones look pretty close. I think her chin is more pointed.
The shading is really weird, but for a recon with estimated tissue depth I feel it's somewhat enough to make a comparison. Eventually I'll get around to fixing the shading and doing etc features.
Could someone name the current exclusion list for this Jane Doe? I'm not from the US so I can't see the exclusions by NamUs.