gitana1
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- May 31, 2005
- Messages
- 29,412
- Reaction score
- 230,357
Some good articles about the faked research:
Autism/MMR Vaccine Study Faked: FAQ
20 years ago, research fraud catalyzed the anti-vaccination movement. Let’s not repeat history.
Retracted autism study an 'elaborate fraud,' British journal finds - CNN.com
And an extra:
No MMR-Autism Link in Large Study of Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Kids | Autism Speaks
In the largest-ever study of its kind, researchers again found that the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine did not increase risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This proved true even among children already considered at high risk for the disorder.
In all, the researchers analyzed the health records of 95,727 children, including more than 15,000 children unvaccinated at age 2 and more than 8,000 still unvaccinated at age 5. Nearly 2,000 of these children were considered at risk for autism because they were born into families that already had a child with the disorder.
Yeah I was persuaded by the anectodal evidence. Parent after parent. Child after child. So many cases of kids who seemed fine before the shot and developed autism symptoms directly after.
But then I read the research. Really read it. Study upon study. It's clear. Kids who are not vaccinated develop autism at the exact same rates. No difference.
Then I started remembering some things about the numerous videos and books I've read about autism. And do you know what else seemed to precipitate the regression? A cold. The flu. An operation. Bad allergies.
It seems that anything that affects the immune system or the body systemically can trigger the development of regressive autism in a child. But it doesn't matter if they avoid vaccines. Something is going to trigger it at some point. You can't prevent kids from getting colds. Even if the effect of vaccines on the immune system triggers it in some kids (and there's no proof of this), the studies are definitive. There is no increase in rates of diagnosis. Period.
And as to the speculation that big pharma funded the studies so they must be faked, here's the deal:
1. For the conspiracy theory to be real, there would have to be the impossibility of not one leak ever of anyone admitting numbers were fudged.
2. We would have to accept that most doctors and scientists (who support vaccines and the studies) are evil and want to harm children or are fatally stupid.
3. We would have to ignore this logic: Health insurance companies are for profit (with the exception of Kaiser). It's about shareholders and stock prices. It's about profit. Health insurance companies push vaccines like mad. All the childhood vaccines and flu vaccines each year, which only reduce the risk of flu.
Why?
There is zero proof of any big pharma kickbacks. None. If there were such kickbacks there would be multiple lawsuits about that.
There is no way such kickbacks would be able to remain secret.
Mathematically, the amount of any such kick backs would be prohibitive. Even for big pharma. Why? Because it would have to be massively huge enough to make up for the costs to the insurance companies to treat all the people anti-vaxxers claims are made ill or injured from vaccines. They make numerous claims about such injuries. If there was one shred of evidence correlating vaccines with more than rare injuries or with all the illnesses anti-vaxxers now claim vaccines cause, no way would health insurance companies push them.
Because they bear the costs of treating ill insured and insurance companies are all about keeping people healthy with the minimal amount of treatment and preventative measure possible.
The fact is, vaccines prevent serious illnesses. They reduce the risk of dangerous illness. They work.
100%? No. Nothing is always perfect. But enough that insurance companies who play the numbers game, know how necessary vaccines are.