Tortoise
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2015
- Messages
- 26,409
- Reaction score
- 133,174
I seems odd to try to claim that OP's abilities with his prostheses on bear any relation to his abilities with them off.
As far as I know he holds no records for running on his stumps.
This hasn't got anything to do with his abilities. He has had a clean mental evaluation. He says he approached a potentially deadly situation where he could not have escaped if he had wanted to, despite having no mental defects (and despite having a pair of prostheses as readily available to him as his firearm).
Even if you believe him, you must consider that his loaded firearm in ready mode more than compensated for his mobility issues. He was protected.
The SCA found that he had no reason to believe his life was in danger. The door did not move and he was not devoid of his senses, he decided not to fire a warning shot. This is proof that he fully appreciated the unlawfulness of his actions.
He then claimed that he did not consciously fire his gun, or aim at the perceived danger. Proof that he was not actually defending himself against a perceived attack at all.
So to cut a long story short, he has had a fair hearing and his story is just that, a story, one that defies any belief, a despicable coward's attempt to avoid the truth at all costs.