Yes, the truth will come out eventually - and it will be quite a surprise to all.
sadly this is what has been said over and over and over again....what exactly is this truth??????:waitasec::bang:
Yes, the truth will come out eventually - and it will be quite a surprise to all.
Ha! I just now got what CYA stands for. Every time I see it I think "see ya". :waitasec:
Lanie
Since Casey is a confirmed liar, thief, and a "spiteful B*tch" (her words, not mine)...I would have to say that after following every word, nuance, and testimony from her twisted mouth and actions on video/photographs/evidence (not what the media has portrayed)...I did make up my mind! This is NOT a court of law and I don't have to give her the benefit of the doubt for being innocent until proven guilty here. Anyone who can reason can figure it out for themselves and should come to the same conclusion...that everything points to Casey and the A fam. Period. There WAS no Nanny. There WAS no kidnapping. There WAS no job or need for a Nanny to begin with! Don't get me started on the facts of this case...because I can back up the things I say.Seems to me that a lot of WSr's have made allegations on this case based on media reports and circumstantial information and no one is asking them to cough up the proof. Casey has already been tried and found guilty on this and many other forums - innocent until proven guilty by a jury of her peers seems to have been forgotten. Has anyone even considered that what she is saying may be true? There are facts in this case that need closer scrutiny but are being dismissed because LE and others have already made up their minds. Something really stinks with the players surrounding this tragic tale and money seems to be a key factor.
I don't make frivolous statements, and I don't feel the need to justify my information. You can dismiss it all or you can choose to think a little deeper into what is at the core of this case. Your choice.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeriouslySearching View Post
Correction. There were bones scattered all over an acre plus area on Nov. 15th. I say that Caylee WAS there on Nov. 15th, if that is when the video was shot, and that he simply missed seeing the bag or remains. When the forensics come out, I believe they will back this up. There will be ways to tell how long the remains were there. For starters, how far down did they have to dig to find those tiny little bones? This will give them a place to begin.
Unless you have seen the actual footage, you cannot know that DC was in the EXACT spot.
by Dearmont:
Yes, the truth will come out eventually - and it will be quite a surprise to all
this line (bolded by me) has a familiar ring to it......
but, personally , I will be grateful for and "surprised" by ANY truth that comes out of this convoluted and very sad tale........
Seems to me that a lot of WSr's have made allegations on this case based on media reports and circumstantial information and no one is asking them to cough up the proof. Casey has already been tried and found guilty on this and many other forums - innocent until proven guilty by a jury of her peers seems to have been forgotten. Has anyone even considered that what she is saying may be true? There are facts in this case that need closer scrutiny but are being dismissed because LE and others have already made up their minds. Something really stinks with the players surrounding this tragic tale and money seems to be a key factor.
I don't make frivolous statements, and I don't feel the need to justify my information. You can dismiss it all or you can choose to think a little deeper into what is at the core of this case. Your choice.
Maybe they came to WS and saw the ping map and realized how often she hung out in front of that area. When was the document dump with all the pings?
But this forum is a court of public opinion, not a court of law. We have looked at the evidence that has been made known and our opinions are based on that. Yes, we make assumption about some of the data - that Casey was the one who googled shovels, etc. but we can do that here.
I think people are asking you for proof because you are saying these things as facts, not I have heard or rumor has it. We always ask people who make factual statements to provide proof so we can assign whatever degree of believeability (is that a word?) to the statement based on the source.
Still sounds fishy to me though...they could have done the same as I just did...
Still looking for Kio's statement to LE yet...unless someone else already found it.
Mods I think this thread is getting a bit long. LOL :blowkiss:
Is it possible or even likely that the prosecution was releasing only enough information needed to 1) fulfill Sunshine Law requests and 2) apply pressure on the parents - particularly Cindy - to force cooperation?
For example, the release of trunk forensics followed closely Cindy's public criticism of LE for not looking for a live Caylee. Cindy had described the smell of a dead body in the trunk in her third 911 call, then changed her story and said it had to be a pizza. The prosecution then released the preliminary report on the odor analysis, essentially saying "Cindy, you did indeed smell a dead body. It was not a pizza - there was not one in the trunk, but we tested it's odor anyway."
Subsequent releases in October and November seem to coincide with upticks in criticism of LE by the Anthonys, again for not searching for a live Caylee. Release of George and Cindy videos and transcripts right before the November TES search appear to be in response to the criticisms of that impending search.
Sorry, that I cannot divulge.
Yes, the truth will come out eventually - and it will be quite a surprise to all.
Here's a good example of my point - what proof do you have that Casey googled anything about shovels, chloroform, neck breaking, etc? Anyone in that household had access to the computer. It has been reported in the press that Casey did all these searches - nothing proves that she actually touched the keyboard.
Seems to me that a lot of WSr's have made allegations on this case based on media reports and circumstantial information and no one is asking them to cough up the proof. Casey has already been tried and found guilty on this and many other forums - innocent until proven guilty by a jury of her peers seems to have been forgotten. Has anyone even considered that what she is saying may be true? There are facts in this case that need closer scrutiny but are being dismissed because LE and others have already made up their minds. Something really stinks with the players surrounding this tragic tale and money seems to be a key factor.
I don't make frivolous statements, and I don't feel the need to justify my information. You can dismiss it all or you can choose to think a little deeper into what is at the core of this case. Your choice.
Here's a good example of my point - what proof do you have that Casey googled anything about shovels, chloroform, neck breaking, etc? Anyone in that household had access to the computer. It has been reported in the press that Casey did all these searches - nothing proves that she actually touched the keyboard.
LE hasn't released certain things which are included in the ongoing investigation in the doc dumps. I think they will find at the time that she went either onto her myspace or into her email (password protected areas) during the same time frame in order to find she was the one who did searches for those things. They can also place where others were due to their cell phone pings and alibis which would either include/exclude other members of the fam.Here's a good example of my point - what proof do you have that Casey googled anything about shovels, chloroform, neck breaking, etc? Anyone in that household had access to the computer. It has been reported in the press that Casey did all these searches - nothing proves that she actually touched the keyboard.
While I heartily disagree with dearmont's sentiments in this case, I have also heard that Kronk was a former bounty hunter, though I'd be hard-pressed to tell you exactly which station I heard it on. I have seen it mentioned over at Frightened Primates as well.