formerlyme
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2021
- Messages
- 1,340
- Reaction score
- 10,385
I guess my questions / thoughts are, A. if the security detail is standard can a campaign hire more security, I would assume they would assess and if they are seeing what so many see in hindsight raise a concern and hire more.
B. the shooter was off grounds? correct? so he did not go through any type of metal detector? Several years ago I went to a rally and only had a secret service pat down no metal detector so I am curious.
C. Is there any photo proof that shooter was walking around with gun? and along those lines, was gun assembled or disassembled.
D. If secret service job is to protect the core and each outer section away from the candidate are following layers SS did their job protecting his body, but I feel there was not enough security on the extra layers/sections and that is where the large issue lies.
B. the shooter was off grounds? correct? so he did not go through any type of metal detector? Several years ago I went to a rally and only had a secret service pat down no metal detector so I am curious.
C. Is there any photo proof that shooter was walking around with gun? and along those lines, was gun assembled or disassembled.
D. If secret service job is to protect the core and each outer section away from the candidate are following layers SS did their job protecting his body, but I feel there was not enough security on the extra layers/sections and that is where the large issue lies.