The WHY is wholly appropriate in every case of sleuthing and it must be asked.
In this case we don't actually know what she did or didn't do if she found them hanging due to an act of somebody, not herself.
She is still innocent until proven guilty.
Where is the proof that she did nothing?
She did something.
She called for help very soon after the asphyxiation or they could not have been recussitated artifically.
Not soon enough to prevent brain death obviously but their condition could have worsened in hospital or secondary complications could have arisen.
We must ask why.
Because she has not been charged with a crime.
Morning Kitty, and all!
I do understand your logic.
However, I will leave the confirmed whys to the ME, forensics, and what is uncovered in the ongoing LE investigations as to what it reveals.
We are a long way out from knowing the confirmed whys by the supporting evidence. Ongoing investigations like this one takes time, but we will know in due time, like we know in all ongoing investigations when completed, where deaths have occured under very suspicious circumstances, imo.
We rarely know the specifics at this juncture when any investigation is ongoing.
So I don't find this one totally different than others. All we know about this investigation is it's an ongoing criminal investigation.
I also think we know both children were still hanging from the basement rafters when EMTs arrived, and got them down, and both died. Imo, both most likely were brain dead when taken down, and the three day wait was because they were both organ donors.
I do think their older brother will be a valuable asset for the investigators, and will have a wealth of information to inform LE what had happened inside of their home even before the 2 children were found hung from the basement rafters.
Imo, he can answer many questions they most assuredly have. He has already informed them his mom had several phones. So I think he is fully cooperating with LE.
As we know, no investigation only includes what just happened in any death, but they always go back to find out what may have gone on in the home or life in general.. before the deaths occured, and what was done afterwards.
All of it, before, during, and afterwards will be of vital importance to all LE investigations.
This one will be the same. We just saw the same thing happen when Josh Brown woundup being murdered. Its SOP for all investigations for no death is ever done in a vacuum, starting, and ending there..
As for IUPG, I wholeheartedly agree. IUPG applies to each sitting jury before any evidence has been entered. After OSs, then compelling evidence can quuckly erode IUPG of any defendant.
However, that is only a required judicial standard that must be adhered to in courtrooms everywhere by each set of juries.
IUPG does not spillover to the public at large as a requirement.
Instead all UNinvolved citizens have the freedom to express an indivudual opinion about anything, including criminal cases. We are free to express our opinions before an arrest, during, and afterwards... even after verdicts have been rendered by jurors.
None of us are legally bound to be in agreement with IUPG or the jury or anyone else for that matter on any subject matter.
Jmho
