PA - Leon Katz, infant, murdered, and twin, injured by babysitter, Pittsburgh- June 24, 2024

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
So was it a bassinet, or a bouncer seat?

A preliminary hearing was held for Nicole Virzi, a San Diego woman who was babysitting 6-and-a-half-week-old Leon Katz when she said he had fallen from his bassinet.


Virzi told police she had gone in the family's kitchen to get a baby bottle and heard the baby screaming. She told police that when she returned, the baby was on the floor and out of a bouncer seat.


I’m guessing a reclined glider/bouncer - example below. Not a “bounce-a-roo” for an older infant with trunk control and not a bedside bassinet or “play ‘n play.”

 
Can't imagine what all the info is that will help explain but it just doesn't make sense.....especially a newborn falling out of a bassinet.
----‐-------------------------------------
A preliminary hearing was held for Nicole Virzi, a San Diego woman who was babysitting 6-and-a-half-week-old Leon Katz when she said he had fallen from his bassinet.

"There is a general misunderstanding of what transpired in the public. And we ask that people wait until they've heard all the facts to resolve their thoughts on this matter. And the facts will come out at the appropriate time at the appropriate venue. We asked that people refrain from judging," Shrager said.

 
Can't imagine what all the info is that will help explain but it just doesn't make sense.....especially a newborn falling out of a bassinet.
----‐-------------------------------------
A preliminary hearing was held for Nicole Virzi, a San Diego woman who was babysitting 6-and-a-half-week-old Leon Katz when she said he had fallen from his bassinet.

"There is a general misunderstanding of what transpired in the public. And we ask that people wait until they've heard all the facts to resolve their thoughts on this matter. And the facts will come out at the appropriate time at the appropriate venue. We asked that people refrain from judging," Shrager said.

The last sentence in the article quotes her lawyer saying they plan to enter a guilty plea.
 
I’m hitting a paywall.
Why did they never determine if it was the sitter or the parents?
Why no charges?
Why are the parents suing the city? On what grounds?
oops, I don't know why it's behind a paywall. Anyway, here is an excerpt from the article:

"
On Oct. 17 2014, several days after little Hudson’s arrival at his parents’ $1.7 million condo in The Edge, on Williamsburg’s waterfront, Dipede and Jamieson, both 46, decided to go out. They left the boys with a baby nurse.

At about 9:30 p.m., the nurse found Hudson wasn’t breathing. Paramedics brought Hudson to Woodhull Hospital soon after where he was pronounced dead, the suit says.

Doctors at Woodhull “did not suspect any abuse or neglect.” But a pathologist for the city Medical Examiner’s office — “who had never previously performed an autopsy on an infant” — decided Hudson had been abused before even completing his examination, the parents claim.

The abuse allegation was ultimately referred to the Administration for Children’s Services. Investigators there spoke to Hudson’s pediatrician and a brain surgeon who told them that minor brain bleeds were “typical in premature infants … and were not a sign of child abuse.”

ACS removed Archer from the home, claiming his “life was consequently in danger if he remained.”

ACS did not respond to requests for comment. The city Medical Examiner maintains Hudson died from homicide by “abusive head trauma.”

A judge put Archer in the custody of a family friend and later Jameison’s parents. A family court judge on Nov. 6, 2014 tossed ACS’s push to take Archer from his parents.

The agency filed formal child abuse charges against the parents in Family Court that same day, the lawsuit maintains.

Eight months after he started the autopsy — while the parents were still fighting charges in Family Court — the pathologist finished and determined Hudson had died from homicide, specifically “violent shaking.” But he also found that the alleged trauma would have been suffered after 8:30 p.m. when the parents were away.

The pathologist mangled the procedure and “recklessly or intentionally destroyed portions of the (infant’s) body … including (Hudson’s) eyes and spinal cord, thereby precluding competent physicians from doing a second autopsy,” his parents say.

The ME’s office gave cops the report — prompting a criminal investigation. The parents were never charged with any crime. But ACS pursued family court charges against the parents for six months, which were ultimately dismissed."
 
The last sentence in the article quotes her lawyer saying they plan to enter a guilty plea.
Back thread already discussed that it was a misprint. Best not to spread misprints.
I don't even know what to say.....
Her attorney already appeared in front of the Judge to confirm this is going to trial.


To clarify-- Virzi’s attorney David Shrager told The Post Saturday his client was innocent, and planned to plead not guilty.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
155
Guests online
1,909
Total visitors
2,064

Forum statistics

Threads
601,051
Messages
18,117,870
Members
230,996
Latest member
truelove
Back
Top