PA - Leon Katz, infant, murdered, and twin, injured by babysitter, Pittsburgh- June 24, 2024

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
These are the two news articles from the PA area where this happened. I think they stick to the facts without too much sensationalism. They also provide video news reports. That second link shows all the family and friends who showed up for the initial arraignment hearing that only lasted minutes. Looks like the twin's parents have many friends and a caring community's support.

NV's decision was to not enter her plea that day. NV's attorney gave that statement that NV, on that date, "was respectful in not wanting to put the family through hearing the heart wrenching details of what happened". Argh, that must've really exasperated the twin's parents and people who showed up... they want and demand some darn answers. No glossing over the facts at trial. Everything has to be revealed. Let's get to the bottom of this tragedy.

Next court date is August 23 when she'll enter her plea.

Updated: 9:26 AM EDT Jun 18, 2024

Updated: 7:22 PM EDT Jul 24, 2024
 
Do you think it was more along the lines of losing her temper with an infant who wouldn’t settle down?
I am honestly not sure what to think. I think I mentioned that I sat on a jury in a case where a toddler was left paralyzed and blind from an abusive head injury. In that case, we later learned that the defendant was covering for the actual abuser by saying it was an accident.

I believe someone lost their temper. If it was NV, it could have been frustration with the infant. It could have been anger at the parents for having been left to babysit, maybe longer than intended. It could have been anger at someone else entirely - maybe she took a phone call that set her off.

There is so much here that we don’t know yet.

jmo
 
I am honestly not sure what to think. I think I mentioned that I sat on a jury in a case where a toddler was left paralyzed and blind from an abusive head injury. In that case, we later learned that the defendant was covering for the actual abuser by saying it was an accident.

I believe someone lost their temper. If it was NV, it could have been frustration with the infant. It could have been anger at the parents for having been left to babysit, maybe longer than intended. It could have been anger at someone else entirely - maybe she took a phone call that set her off.

There is so much here that we don’t know yet.

jmo
Yes, I hope investigators and the trial will get to the bottom of it. Very perplexing with the first twin at the ER while this unfolded.
 
"PITTSBURGH —
The San Diego woman charged with killing one baby twin and assaulting the other while visiting the newborn's parents in Shadyside chose to waive her right to a preliminary hearing Wednesday.

Nicole Virzi, a 29-year-old psychology doctoral student, was brought from jail to court for the proceeding and the courtroom was filled with family and friends of the parents of the twins, who were present as well.
[mod edit]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, I hope investigators and the trial will get to the bottom of it. Very perplexing with the first twin at the ER while this unfolded.
I'm not sure whether investigators will be able to explain what exactly she did and why. That will be up to her, I think, and chances are she'll protect herself rather than be completely honest about her own state of mind.

I think clinical psychologists are expected to have very strong control over their own tempers. They are expected to never 'lash out' with violence at patients, for example.

JMO
 
I'm not sure whether investigators will be able to explain what exactly she did and why. That will be up to her, I think, and chances are she'll protect herself rather than be completely honest about her own state of mind.

I think clinical psychologists are expected to have very strong control over their own tempers. They are expected to never 'lash out' with violence at patients, for example.

JMO
True, but what do you suppose happened, with the first twin, and then the second? The jury will surely want to know. Was she under the influence of drugs or something? The whole thing makes little sense to me. It’s not like she was some child care worker who snapped from too much daily stress. She was visiting friends in the academic community. It just isn’t adding up for me….
 
True, but what do you suppose happened, with the first twin, and then the second? The jury will surely want to know. Was she under the influence of drugs or something? The whole thing makes little sense to me. It’s not like she was some child care worker who snapped from too much daily stress. She was visiting friends in the academic community. It just isn’t adding up for me….
I agree, it's very puzzling. Drugs are always possible, though I think first responders/police would have noticed.

IMO, it's something very weird to do with her state of mind, and possibly her relationship with the mother or something. Perhaps the first incident led to the second ie someone might get even more deeply into whatever the crazy was, while being alone waiting/anticipating being blamed for it?

JMO
 
I I agree, it's very puzzling. Drugs are always possible, though I think first responders/police would have noticed.

IMO, it's something very weird to do with her state of mind, and possibly her relationship with the mother or something. Perhaps the first incident led to the second ie someone might get even more deeply into whatever the crazy was, while being alone waiting/anticipating being blamed for it?

JMO
Yes, it might have escalated. But if so, then she was definitely not normal, but a ticking time bomb. To be a PhD student, visiting people in another city within the academic community and to offer to baby sit — and then to let things get that crazy and out of hand is just way beyond the norm.

Picture yourself in these circumstances, could you possibly have let these events happen?

As I said earlier, we’ve all seen stories about the child care workers, some of them with secret addictions issues, who are maybe uneducated, overworked or stressed and then snap.

But this was a very different situation, almost festive, visiting another city and meeting fellow academics: And she the daughter of a prominent specialist— I am just baffled.

I feel like I’m missing a big part of the story….
 
Last edited:
Did NV lose patience and self-control because she didn't know how to deal with crying infants. MOO, there are times babies can be very demanding and require super human patience. My kids were pretty easy babies, but I know sometimes a fussy baby persistently wailing and crying tends to drive the loving parents crazy, but that's their child.

(Once, years ago, persistent noise caused a tenant in the below apt. to go upstairs and start stabbing the person who lived there to stop the noise.)

On the other hand, NV just got into town that week, not bonded to those babies. She may have thought she knew how to handle babies and ran into unexpected fussiness. Go ahead, run a search "baby's frantic crying can drive you crazy" and there's plenty of results and crazy is the common word. Of course, most parents don't feel anger and many have prepared themselves by reading up on infant care and how to deal with a fussy baby. Wondering if NV lacked all patience or tools, despite all her academic accomplishments. All MOO here.
 
...Once, years ago, persistent noise caused a tenant in the below apt. to go upstairs and start stabbing the person who lived there to stop the noise....
RSBM
So, to me, that is not a natural, normal reaction. Persistent noise might cause a person to make complaints, or look for another place to live, or, childishly, thump on the ceiling with a broom, but IMO it wouldn't cause 99.999% of people to get a knife and stab the person. IMO, that is the behaviour of someone with a deeply disturbed mind who probably has long-held violent fantasies.

JMO
 
Did NV lose patience and self-control because she didn't know how to deal with crying infants

Although that does happen with immature impulsive babysitters, it really shouldn't, because they are just there for some hours. They could just go to another room. Just walk away from the crying baby. It's so different being the babysitter for a few hours than being the parent 24/7.
 
RSBM
So, to me, that is not a natural, normal reaction. Persistent noise might cause a person to make complaints, or look for another place to live, or, childishly, thump on the ceiling with a broom, but IMO it wouldn't cause 99.999% of people to get a knife and stab the person. IMO, that is the behaviour of someone with a deeply disturbed mind who probably has long-held violent fantasies. JMO​

I'd say you're probably correct, @Cedars. You'll all probably be interested to know, the woman that stabbed the upstairs neighbor was arrested, taken away, and got evicted. It was considered breaking her lease agreement by getting violent, and she had to move out asap.

She was never a friendly person, and came across to everyone as a sour puss. She had some kind of social issues, but not visible anger. It's hard to imagine some people having seething violent thoughts. Maybe she did. MOO, I don't think she had violent fantasies so much as a serious inability to cope and deal with social matters normally.
Some people hide it until they can't hide it anymore and that may be NV. Just sharing and all MOO.

 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
74
Guests online
1,992
Total visitors
2,066

Forum statistics

Threads
602,087
Messages
18,134,461
Members
231,231
Latest member
timbo1966
Back
Top