Mrs. Badcrumble
The North remembers
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2018
- Messages
- 1,864
- Reaction score
- 9,800
I had to go out of my way to find it. There was a thread on a certain website (whose name automatically gets censored on here) talking about "scariest doe cases" and one of the comments linked to the picture, which was originally posted on Instagram by a lady who works in the forensic field. The post caused a lot of controversy because it was tagged with terms such as "pregnancy", and people who would be looking for such tags may not want to see graphic content. From what I've heard, in previous years, it was easy to stumble upon the picture on accident, but in doing research for this case, I never saw it on Google Images. Granted, I wasn't specifically looking for it then, but as I became more interested in Beth Doe, I intentionally sought it out, as odd as that may seem.
Snipped for focus.
Really? I've stumbled acrossed it many times on GI, and I wasn't looking for myself, either. Just popping up randomly when I was searching for something else (which makes it even more horrifying because you are not expecting it and therefore less prepared to see something like that). I even came across it on Facebook!
I wonder, could there be different search algorithms or/and depending on your IP adress? I am located in Europe, btw.