Here's the thing though.....
Let's say she offered up some type of scenario as to how Zahra was murdered.....in turn the DA offered to take the death penalty off the table for this information....IF after recovery the evidence proved that what she said was false, does that mean that the deal would be null and void?
For example, she says Zahra died from a reoccurence of cancer. They only dismembered. Later evidence gathered from Zahra's remains show no sign of cancer.
Anyone???
We don't know when she died. I'm not especially keen to believe the furniture shop lady saw her on 9-25. She hasn't been since since school ended. Maybe she's been deceased since early summer. Would cancer still show up after all this time?
DA probably put a truth clause in her deal.