Meara
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2013
- Messages
- 512
- Reaction score
- 337
You noticed that, huh? Ever read God's Little Acre?
Just looked it up. :giggle:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You noticed that, huh? Ever read God's Little Acre?
You noticed that, huh? Ever read God's Little Acre?
And you don't think a child would be up front about itching? I have a girl. At 6 yrs old she would not be shy about her symptoms.
Are you aware of where the hymen is? Also that it would not be the target "itch" area? We are talking major penetration in one area...why would only one area itch...twice!?
Ok. So the standard is that if only one person says it (even if the ickiness under the fingernails corroborates), then it is folk lore? Remember that...
So sorry, I wasn't very clear. You had said, But in this case people have made patsy out to be a monster and there is just nothing to support it but rhetoric and fantasy. And I wondered whether your criticism extended to GJ testimony -- i.e., do you believe the GJ indictment was based only on rhetoric and fantasy?
So sorry, I wasn't very clear. You had said, But in this case people have made patsy out to be a monster and there is just nothing to support it but rhetoric and fantasy. And I wondered whether your criticism extended to GJ testimony -- i.e., do you believe the GJ indictment was based only on rhetoric and fantasy?
Not if it had cleared up. And she could have not only suffered adhesions or deterioration from it but she could have also damaged herself itching it or trying to relieve the pain and itching.
No one says there was questionable hygiene except the housekeeper. And all those she told. That does not make it so. No one at the pageants have said this, her dr, the school, no one has come out with this info except the hk.. The ME did not say she was dirty and unkempt. I think this is folk lore.
"No one at a pageant have said this"
"And she could have not only suffered adhesions or deterioration from it but she could have also damaged herself itching it or trying to relieve the pain and itching."
when asked about the numerous Dr visits PR said that JB's toileting hygiene was sub-par, that she wiped carelessly (if at all) and that her panties were frequently wet with urine. not damp, wet. that information was offered by the mother. no details were asked for/given re fecal debris and skid marks
JB died on the 25th/26th and had not bathed since the 24th (and maybe not then IIRC, it was all very vague) although she did dress up and appeared well-groomed at the party. PR could not identify the last time the child washed her hands, and wasn't aware if she had done it before/after dinner at the White house. it would be the most natural thing in the world for a mother to say "she's not real good about doing it so I washed her hands before she ate cracked crab for dinner and/or I washed her hands (again) after she ate dinner. and/or: I washed her hands with a wet cloth while putting her to bed that night. nope. couldn't remember the last time her child's hands were cleaned. PR's words. according to the AR JB's fingernails were dirty, there was dirt/debris beneath the little gold ring she was wearing and her feet were dirty
:notgood:
No. I've had vaginitis.
Doesn't erode the hymen, wasn't present in the autopsy (and would have been), the doctor that actually treated her for previous complaints not only didn't diagnose vaginitis, but didn't even look for it.
Panel of named medical experts v. unsourced FBI experts...not a hard choice.
It's not just that, 2 percent. Mama2JML, like so many before her, misinterpreted what the FBI meant. They were talking about the injury that was inflicted at the time of JB's death.
I think that is up to interpretation. I believe they meant well that they did not believe there was any prior abuse.
Given the context in which it was said, my way is more likely.
That is just normal kid stuff. Not anything else. That is what kids do. They wait to long to go and they often don't wipe well.
Oh my gosh. She had a bath on Christmas eve and then not when in 24 hours? The horror.
None of this adds up to a poorly kept child. It adds up to a child.
Kids like to play and get dirty. no smoking gun there.
No, under garments wet with urine is not something "that kids just do." Kids don't just defecate in their beds and underwear either. The inability to clean themselves you say is expected in children, but the fact that neither child properly "went to the bathroom" at different age gaps is telling IMO. The housekeeper would be in the know about the Ramsey's the most. They've seen them behind the scenes and know how the home was ran behind closed doors. Their testimonies are very important and just because you don't agree with it doesn't mean you can discredit them and call them liars. And for the record, I don't think PR was a monster. I think she made a poor decision and tried to cover it up in a way that made sense in her own mind.
The point of a grand jury indicting someone is so the evidence can be presented to a jury. It would've been an eye opening thing (one way or another) to have been able to have the Ramsey's testify and answer questions Too bad it never happened. A sign of disturbance in a household is two children who wet beds and leave poop here and there.
Yes it is. And there is no proof of any child defecating in a bed but they do that too.
It is so common it has a name. Encopresis. http://kidshealth.org/parent/emotions/behavior/encopresis.html
A child of JBR age who had frequent urinary issues could absolutely have issues with urinating that were not even under her control. But many many kids pee their pants when playing or waiting too long.
Kids have biological issues just as adults. Some kids bed wet until puberty.
All these things are normal for that Child. They may have medical reasons or psychological reasons but it is normal to have kids with wet pants and bathroom issues.
It has been brought up numerous times that the bed wetting and pooping issues COULD be a possible indication that something was amiss in the household. There have been different sources posted about it, it's not like it's totally out of the realm of possibilities.
In interviews with the housekeepers, PR, etc... found stains. You can say there's no proof, but PR even acknowledged the poo stains and claimed they were from not wiping. So yes, there was indication that she did defecate. Yes kids do have bathroom issues, but JB's bed-wetting incidents were becoming progressively worse at the age of 6 in comparison to incidents from when she was younger according to Wilcox. She also stated "But I also told the police it was curious to me that Burke stopped wetting the bed when he stopped being the focus of Patsy's attention. And that was when JonBenet became a chronic bed wetter. But you know if you have little kids around that age, they are bed wetters. When I left in September of 1995, they were both still wetting their beds." Yes children wet the bed, but the pattern is what is important to me. I know not every child who wets the bed is being abused. The fact that she used to at a slower rate than she did at the age of 6 shows a regression into infantile behavior which is a common symptom of sexual abuse. Teachers said JB became excessively clingy to PR in December of 1996, which is yet another symptom of sexual abuse. Unexplained personality changes or seeming insecure is also a sign. Which she displayed when she "didn't feel pretty" and couldn't eat McDonalds ("her favorite thing in the whole world") with Suzanne because "It makes you fat." The bed wetting solely doesn't mean she was being abused, but she had other symptoms sexually abused children often display. Taking the above with the autopsy results is how I came to my conclusion that the bed-wetting wasn't just kids being kids IMO.
Really it is an indication of nothing more than normal kids. There is no link to anything else that would make this be anything more. No abuse charges or reports. Nothing other than an ordinary household. You can not use this as indicators when the evidence does not support it. These are common issues that normal kids have EVERY.DAY.