scandi
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2003
- Messages
- 18,226
- Reaction score
- 51
Regarding the extortion attempt, the consensus on either JVM or NG (I can't remember which, sorry) was that it was a "sting", JVDS was set-up. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy JMHO.(read sarcasm here)
Hi Jmarple, I went back and pulled this link from pp #1 cause I've had a hard time understanding it too:
http://ftpcontent.worldnow.com/wbrc/docs/VANDERSLOOTCOMPLAINT.pdf
The trigger point I see that fits in this case now:
* Sending money via a money-wire transfer internationally seems to be against the law when only a promise for something to be traded back for it is given.
Anyone else see how it actually was that the law was broken? I think it is a weak possibility, but then I don't know all about it either. LOL