Ah huhh!! Makes a lot of sense actually. There are plenty of men who like Voyeurism, one thing I have been learning fast with this is that there are tons and tons of fetishes (creepy ones for that matter).
Voyeurism is pretty common and in fact mostly on the harmless end of that spectrum.
I still think he had someone over. Just cause MP didn't see anyone does not mean that this drifter or who ever could of been in a different room by then or up stars. From what I understand MP wasn't in the house all that long. So in all reality MP could be telling the truth about this. The question would be why would this man not want to be seen or named?
When MP and SG arrived, JB, according to MP's testimony came out. Which is the same JB told. So MP came into the house the time, when he performed his little movie quiz on SG and, as it appears a second time, when JB allegedly wanted to get her out of the house. Which ended up with SG running out. So, one of the voices in the background on the tape could be MP? Another one JB. That makes two. Two can be already interpreted as several. So can three. Which poses the question, did MP actually saw only JB or didn't he mention another man for a reason? Or, as you implicate, did another man hide?
From what I have read the neighbors said they seen JB and another man out a few days after moving things into a u haul. Who was that guy and what were they moving at night? His stuff out of the house? Just a thought.
JB just said, it was a "friend". I don'T think, we got here ever an ID on that friend.
I have to admit that the more I read I just can't find a reason for MP joining in and killing SG or being part of a killing team. Unless if he is the driver for them but I doubt that.
MP has a history of prostitution related priors. To me, the thing with the passport seems to indicate, he tried at least at a time, to become a pimp on his own. However, since this didn't work out he became a driver. Essentially, this guy was making his life off of those girls since years, they were investment and income source for him. Which not only takes motive to kill one of them from him, it gives him also motive to keep them alive. Unfortunately, that motive wouldn't force him to stay when police was coming in or made him any brighter, which would have been helpful that night as well, because, we talked a lot that he had no chance to find her and snatch and kill her. But probabilities are, if he would have found her, she would be still alive.
What if this unknown man said to SG they were going to kill her or something and got off on the fear, maybe tried to choke her a little. And maybe JB didn't hear this so thought she was just crazy. Or he was in on it but things went wrong and she made a 911 call and he switched it to she is just acting crazy.
What if, that man or JB said something to her, not knowing, she was anyway about to develop paranoia from a combination og drugs and precondition? Her behavior at GC's place was erratic as well as each and every of the decisions, that formed her way through OB into the marsh. Since JB wasn't interviewed that night, we don't know how stoned he was at the time. But if there were drugs involved, it had to be JB's stash, the drifter's stash or drugs, they bought during that 15-minute trip. But SG had no reason to bring her own supplies. Which consequently means, whatever she took that night wasn't her stuff, not what she was used to. Which then gives an explanation why she ended up with some bad trip.
I've often wondered if well she was at JB house these men really were tormenting her. Saying they were going to kill her and messing with her. Telling her not to bother calling MP like she did because he was in on it also. After all she was just a hooker to these guys they would have no respect for her. Could explain why she ran from MP. Once she took off who's to say this other guy didn't go out creeping around looking for her.
It all sounds crazy to me. But fact is stranger then fiction. And I truly feel she was murdered. That is something I kind of can't over look. I can maybe start to see how MP might not be involved with the murder but that is about it.
Someone says something to someone under the influence of a drug mix ... what makes you think, this person actually gets the same words as they were said. I mentioned it on another thread, I think, but I remember a thing about a girl I once had to talk from a roof. She had taken something and thought, she was a helicopter and about to crash. Obviously triggered was that by a combination of drugs and Pink Floyd's the Wall. So, what this story taught me is, such a trigger for a person under drugs doesn't need to be too explicit. And it doesn't take much. So the question is, was there actually that much tormenting needed?
Another aspect to think about: There is no evidence for murder, there is nobody around who had a motive (including the usual psychopathic serial killer motives). At least not as far as I can see. But here is the rub: Since it was probably JB's stash that came on the table that night, he would be maybe guilty of negligent homicide. However, this drooling "lynch CPH" campaign first, now followed by the next campaign "lynch MP" have successfully buried all chances to investigate that aspect and make it stick.
And just another random thought is I do think the SK is a stalker. I think he gets off on watching his girls before getting them. There have been many of things that just scream stalker to me. Wouldn't voyeurism go hand and hand with someone who liked to stalk? Wasn't MB boyfriend called by the SK and told something along the lines..You like to do some pretty sick stuff with her...kinda like he was watching them like voyeurism?
I think, LISK is a stalker, and yes, like some forms of voyeurism, that is an expression of power and control. But please notice "some forms". Basically voyeurism is pretty common in men. A whole internet *advertiser censored* industry lives from that fact. A little trivia about that: Do you know women have a better sense of smelling than men and a better recognition of colors? While men detect motions much faster and have a slightly wider angle of vision? Actually, those differences were found on an anatomical level by scientists, so it's not, what our brains are trained to recognize, it's actual physiological difference. Which makes men very "visual" creatures. So in fact, there is a reason why men have a tendency to watch and in most cases it is hapless (well till the gf/wife gets upset about him watching other girls, and I don't even talk *advertiser censored* here).
Bottom line: Voyeurism is too common to say, you have a voyeur here, so he must be the person ... because you will find at least five more persons with a taste in watching in the next five houses down the road.
