There could be several reasons for every question you asked. But I'll just stick to a few...I don't think its so unlikely JM was driving the car, not only does he have a history as a cab driver, for perhaps fishy people, many of the missing cases involve abandon cars. If he had done this before I'm pretty sure he knew how to do it without leaving a trail, or perhaps guide someone else in how to do it, meaning have Randy Taylor drive it for him and leave no trace. And I'm pretty sure the last thing he'd want to do is prolong his contact with the man he just commited a murder with. Perhaps when RT was taking care of the car, JM "took care of the body.".
As far as the drugs things....if RT had to turn over actual drugs to prove a drug deal went down...I can think of at least one VERY good reason why he would want to do that....if he turns over those drugs he RATS out his supplier....he doesn't have to say a word...they can tell by the quality/variety of the drug to know where else its been seen........so they know who RT is linked to...and those people might not want that to happen
Not always, If this self grown drugs or self made by someone(pot in this case). The FBI/ Le wouldn't know where he got it from. My point is. They found nothing of drugs. Nothing.. How is he going to say a drug deal went down and not a shred of drugs found??. He don't need any dealer nor name one to prove drugs? I'm not going to tell how , but its very easy angle to prove in court if it was 1st defense statement.
As far randy taylor driving the car.? Yes , he is a tow truck mans they do it all the time with little to none finding a print.. My point is when I heard , the car found no dna of this girl nor her father prints. she drove it to his living area. Her father drove the car everyday his prints should be in the car more than anybody's who borrow it for the said weekend.. How is that possible no prints of anybody but a unknown dna link) which could a damaged finger print, we don't now . Unless he cleaned it out ... Her purse is missing among a lot other things like common papers.? My second point is. Jm would have to seen in this area that night or prior. He was not seen, Rt was seen many times. JM can go state witness so fast with this info and not get anytime . Nada, will he highly doubt it.. I gurentee he say he don't know him.
I don't think Jm helped him in this murder that night, I do assumed another crime, maybe just talked to him the area. Maybe even joy riding with him to tow cars. Picked up his bad habits and perfected them.
I read his(rats) newest statement.. He says I don't know if JM Dna is in the car but the 2rd person who was there I don't want to say.. To me that sound he making up a lie and a witch hunt. How can say jm and about scared of death of murder by drug dealers and now mystery 2nd person. .
I'm not going buy his claim none of it. To me he just told us all, Jm was not there. Please read his new statements. he leading his lawyer on like puppet , and Mr Hallahan need drop this guy pronto, he is manipulating him very badly. It sad to that happen to lawyers, its common. The bad guy giving all these angles and info etc.. Hallahan the one with the law degree and should control all things, he should remember that.