:welcome: GINK and Capricorn76. Thank you for joining and for your well considered questions. You seem to have drawn great sleuthers to respond, which I especially appreciate, as I get to learn things about these cases as the new sleuthers do. I hope to see you around on the threads.
The one thing I took away from viewing parts 5 and 6 is to me, their not the work of LISK. He used a fire arm where LISK gets his high off the control and hands on taking life.
After my own research and watching the Killing Season, I dated when AC killers last victim is reported missing, Then looked at when the first Long Island murder occurred, then the date of the last LISK murder date.
Then I had noticed Ohio serial killings began right after LISK murders ended, This is relevant because all 3 places had virtually same types of killings, victims same all struggling prostitutes, drug addicted women. Similar dumping of bodies near water, all 3 states victims were parted out in different townships, counties. The wrapping or covering bodies in similar way though slightly different but consistent.
All 3 state's victims seem to highlight series of 4 bodies, though others too, but the 4 body theme is in AC Gilgo and Ohio. Ohio is about 540 miles from ny, so maybe the LISK has a work schedule that afforded him time to travel to Ohio, do what he does and returns unmissed. I strongly believe a photo of a person of interest shown in locations in Ohio that is of a person from ny or nj might get hit. Also I would cross reference records such as dmv, Golf courses as I believe there is a golf theme in a profile of person of interest for LISK. NJ records too. These are just basic now because there are so many specific details that support this theory. The Killing Season series and the talk show was very well done, these people care about every victim no matter what.
Though I have the theory of LISK AC and Ohio, I did learn a few things that I wouldn't have by just doing my own studies, research. Though no one knows me here, I have a strong history on working highly controversial cases between 2006 through 2011. then stopped as it took it's toll on me. This case someone asked my opinion and I didn't have one. So, I was propelled into learning everything from everywhere and I have a lot more to organize.
Have the autopsy results ever been released or discussed? Also what about the baby? The baby was wearing jewelry and was described as non-caucasian, what does that mean? My guess is that the child was most likely of Mexican descent/or some other Latin heritage. I am Mexican and know what we buy jewelry for our babies. And another thing I highly doubt the mother Jane doe #3 actually took her child to visit a trick. Not sure if anyone is going to read this. But i feel that by knowing the victims it might lead back to the killer otherwise why else would the killer take the extra effort to hide any identification marks, such as in the case of the mother who had a tattoo and the killer (i read) tried to take it off...hmmm