04009margaret
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2013
- Messages
- 1,406
- Reaction score
- 97
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wouldn't imagine so as it's the state who are starting the process. If it had went the other way and OP was convicted of murder and given a hefty sentence then I'd presume it would have cost him money for lawyers then.
Bullet points from interview with Professor James Grant on 702
JG wasn't in the know about the NPA decision
DE has required some attention for 30 years and has been responsible for some strange decisions.
Error in objecta law needs an authoritative case
Fault requirement for unlawful possession of a firearm needs clearer definition
The ruling that a competent verdict (e.g. CH versus murder) doesn't amount to an acquittal should be revisited by the new SCA.
JG thought OP was not automatically entitled to apply for bail but could be wrong, he hasn't had time to fully research this. OP would have to cross-appeal either the sentence or the conviction to be entitled to reapply for bail.
As I understood she has to be adressed for leave to appeal, but if rejected state can go to Supreme Court directly (as IB wrote above)
I rely on Prof Grant, he will explain all the details to us
No need to worry, she definitely doesn't hear the appealBBM .. well that's the bit that was worrying me, because all she would need to do is grant it, and then if it was her presiding over the actual appeal, then all she will do again is say that the first judgement was the correct one. Reading kaos's post it doesn't seem as though that can happen though (I think!).
Can anyone enlighten me as to what benefit the ANC gain by becoming a Friend of the Court?
I've read all these before, but thank you. The BBC interview is on the list. OP shouldn't have gone to the Olympics because he didn't have the best times. There was another athlete who had beaten OP's times on numerous occasions but he was dropped from the team in favour of OP. It was a political decision. How grossly unfair is that.
More about OP's legal fees:
A source close to the Pistorius family reportedly told the newspaper that R10m was still owing in legal fees.
So this debt has raised questions about who might defend Pistorius should the state appeal the judge’s controversial decision to acquit him of the murder charge – something that must be decided before November 4.
The source said that since Pistorius had no money or earning power, the legal bill had been passed to his family. However, there is “great unhappiness” about its size, the source added, and Pistorius’s uncle Arnold is understood to be challenging it on the grounds that it is “much higher” than expected.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...storius-spent-1m-defending-murder-charge.html
So this is the reason why we did not see Oldwage in the court. I really didn't think he was necessary anyway.
It will be very interesting to see how this pans out.
What is your prediction?
Can anyone enlighten me as to what benefit the ANC gain by becoming a Friend of the Court?
I think both Counsels present argumentI didn't think a lawyer on his side would be necessary because a panel of judges just read the transcript and decided from that???
Oscar Pistorius. Can a singularity throw him into jail for life? Paperback – February 12, 2014
by A Boldireff Strzeminski (Author)
I have never heard of this book before, have you?
Can anyone enlighten me as to what benefit the ANC gain by becoming a Friend of the Court?