BIB
How? Why, the common cause timeline of course tested against common cause objective data. That is the call times wonder advocate Nel (i.e. the State) accepted as common cause. And since the State accepted Johnson's call time as common cause and accepted that the end of Johnson's call, i.e. 3:17, was indicative of the time of the 2nd volley while at the same it was trashing Stipp's 3:15:51 call as indicative for that 2nd volley, we can only presume that either there were central time records that the State agreed with the defence were correct and which we were not party to or the State was grossly negligent and/or foolhardy and/or plain dumb stupid. Simples!
On any view, the timeline does not explain the critical minute when OP was in bed and woke up through to the moment he "heard the noise"
On any view - that part of his evidence was falsified.
Thus on the classic approach to evidence, there is no reliable evidence of any mistake being made.
The evidential onus was on the defence to establish such a foundation for such a mistake.
Under the classic approach that Nel (and any rational prosecutor) would have been expecting, OP's evidence on the "mistake" should have been dismissed in toto as unreliable
So what are we left with?
Multiple witnesses hearing a woman scream which in fact was not rebutted by any specific evidential point.
The timeline has always been a giant red herring