Guys - let's get back On Topic! This thread is about JB's sanctions.
Thanks,
Salem
If the Florida Bar doesn't disbar Baez, the people of FL really need to demand some reform. It's bad enough Perry was re elected, but allowing Baez to practice law is unforgivable.
ITA and frankly I was surprised she was that honest with him. I really wonder how much he knows about her cold & grubby little soul - and yet continues to go well beyond what normal lawyers do. I guess he thinks it's noble but really it just makes him as grubby as she.
Guys - let's get back On Topic! This thread is about JB's sanctions.
Thanks,
Salem
So we know that one of Baez's Bar complaints was from Judge Strickland. Now I see in the article about HHSS resigning from the bench talks about the possibility of a Bar complaint against HHSS for his comments on the Nancy Grace show after the verdict.
I'm wondering if Jose or someone on the DT decided to get snarky and do a "payback" to HHSS because of his original complaint?
No point even asking if Jose is the kind of a person who would do that out of spite because I think I know the unanimous response I would get...:innocent:
So we know that one of Baez's Bar complaints was from Judge Strickland. Now I see in the article about HHSS resigning from the bench talks about the possibility of a Bar complaint against HHSS for his comments on the Nancy Grace show after the verdict.
I'm wondering if Jose or someone on the DT decided to get snarky and do a "payback" to HHSS because of his original complaint?
No point even asking if Jose is the kind of a person who would do that out of spite because I think I know the unanimous response I would get...:innocent:
I don't think it was JB. I think it was CM. There seems to be bad blood between the two. I really think JB does not hold a grudge. I think he let's things go. I don't know how he could do all he has done without letting things go and just stew over it. I think it's CM. jmo
I don't know if I agree - I think JB flies by the seat of his pants so much he's just grateful to anyone who doesn't throw him out of the courtroom.
And maybe it's the written remarks HHSS made about CM's boots among other things. Doubt that was the first time he's done it...
I'm not sure JB has the courage to make a complaint...he has so many against him now and I'm sure HHSS could add a few more. Whereas CM has none, is well thought of (heaven only knows who would feel that way now) and has nothing to lose by complaining. He may not actually go through with the complaint but I see CM spouting off his mouth, per usual. I don't see JB doing that. If JB wants to continue practicing law I would think he does not want enemies on the bench. CM just does not care. jmo
Did he not get one for the infamous hand gesture?
I don't think it was JB. I think it was CM. There seems to be bad blood between the two. I really think JB does not hold a grudge. I think he let's things go. I don't know how he could do all he has done without letting things go and just stew over it. I think it's CM. jmo
One complaint stems from Baez's failure to share discovery information with the prosecution last winter as the Anthony case was heading to trial, according to Francine Walker with the Florida Bar.
That was not a surprise because Baez was sanctioned in January by Chief Judge Belvin Perry and made to pay a fine for his "willful violation" of a court order.
The other complaint, which was less apparent before today, involves Baez's failure to disclose to the court that Casey Anthony was being allowed to serve probation for her check-fraud case while in jail awaiting trial for murder in the death of her 2-year-old daughter Caylee....
Baez Bar complaints explained
Discovery violations and Casey's probation prompted complaints
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/breakingnews/os-jose-baez-bar-complaints-20111018,0,501302.story
Anyone think the State Attorney's office filed the Discovery violation complaint?
I am :fence: it HHBP filed both complaints or one or none.
I am leaning towards him filing the Probation complaint...
First Complaint
In early January, Perry lectured Baez in court after he failed to share detailed information with prosecutors about the opinions of expert witnesses. This incident arose despite earlier orders by Perry specifying what should be provided to the prosecution.
As a result, Perry found Baez was in "willful violation" of the court's order to produce the discovery information. Perry said the discovery rules are in place to prevent "trial by ambush" or "trial by surprise."
Baez ultimately had to pay $583.73 associated with that matter.