ZoeyW
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2014
- Messages
- 381
- Reaction score
- 1
I wondered where she's been hiding LOL. Hopefully her feelings about JA's "remorse" are shared by the others on the panel. What I found interesting is that juror 3 indicates that it sounds good on paper but most everyone here indicates that it does not. I think that is because everyone here can almost hear the way JA would be saying these things in their head when they read it because they know her so well. Sounds like the perception of the cold, unemotional and nonchalant manner of speaking that JA seems to have when talking about this crime was evident to juror 3 as well?
MOO
Cooley's Looking Glass. Not having real emotions, a person tries to feign what they believe the correct emotion they should display based on what the audience wishes to hear / see from them. When the jury Foreman advised the defense team that she was a horrible witness and seemed utterly absent ANY remorse, she decided.....oh remorse, so that is the ticket? Fine, I can do remorse. Jodi Arias yells to the director......Cut . Take two....
Hearing from some of the other jurors from original trial we learned they saw right through her. Here is an interview of Tara Kelley who opined she just wasn't buying what Jodi Arias was selling . Tara asked what the whole world was screaming from the roof tops "After all the lies you have told, why should we believe you now?"
http://www.wildabouttrial.com/one_o...st-tara-kelley-juror-in-the-jodi-arias-trial/
From Dr. Michelle Ward, an expert in clinical psychology
"Her affect. The way she is presenting herself is flat like she is reading a script, talking about someone else. She has learned enough to know that people are emotional about their family, so she tries to feign that. She tries to present the story in a way that would make someone sympathetic NOT how she was actually feeling. Her emotions do not match what she is saying. Although she is supposed to be up there fighting for her life, she is totally disconnected. It is so disconcerting to watch," an expert on psychopathy explained to Dr. Drew
http://youtu.be/wPKOwX2ByTE?t=1m42s
Other jurors opined to similar feelings, she just seemed to be not at all sincere and she showed NO remorse, whatsoever. Here is Dan Gibb, a dismissed juror
http://youtu.be/_q2T0zszCaE "I did not buy her testimony. No!" DG
Diane Schwartz , a juror "It was the brutality of the crime, the LACK OF REMORSE, her untruthfulness that did it for me".
http://youtu.be/-SqRZVECefM
http://youtu.be/wPKOwX2ByTE
Carol Gossling, a alternate juror http://youtu.be/xcO76UR9v_k
Three jurors that voted for the death penalty spoke out http://youtu.be/dDRLc3lCYdg
The common thing I hear in what they all opine is Jodi Arias cold flat affect. She could just lie and lie and lie with a straight face and we just did NOT believe her.
The reason Jodi wanted to testify in secret had nothing, absolutely nothing, whatsoever to do with death threats. She did not want the reporters and public to compare and contrast her stories and acting . Cut. Scene. Bring in the next script!