Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias #1

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Worry Wart said:
Troy Hayden@troyhaydenfox10 · 2h

Documentary filmmaker says #JodiArias gave ok for interview behind bars. @RealSheriffJoe says no to " tale of woe." pic.twitter.com/QnQkIR7pXo

https://twitter.com/troyhaydenfox10
Click to expand...

Of course she gave the OK. I'm sure the words "documentary filmmaker" made her little ears prick right up. She's probably hoping for Ken or Ric Burns. Heck, she's probably got the storyboard ready to go (in pencil).

Sheriff Joe doesn't always come off well in the media, but I'm so glad Jodi ended up in his jail.
 
Curious in Indiana said:
Why did all asterisks show up in the address field? Just wondering.
Click to expand...

Do you have a wireless keyboard in your lap? And a cat? That can sometimes result in unintentional characters if part of the cat is on part of the keyboard.

Or it could be an indication that you typed a really long "bad word" that was automatically censored.
 
AZlawyer said:
The ruling I posted was actually in response to JA's motion to allow the results of some polygraph examination she apparently planned to take. But I agree that the judge made it perfectly clear how she feels about residual doubt evidence in her ruling on the polygraph motion. And she granted JM's motion, which was about residual doubt regardless of the title.

I don't think there will be any actual motion about "lingering doubt" defined as it was in the one article someone posted a while back. I believe the article said "lingering doubt" was about any doubt in a juror's mind regarding whether mitigation was sufficient to call for leniency. I think it would be perfectly appropriate for the defense to argue that jurors should resolve any lingering doubt on that issue in favor of JA. But that argument isn't going to allow JA to bring in "innocence" evidence.
Click to expand...

We are lucky to have you around, AZ, to clarify. Thank you for taking the time to do so.:seeya:
 
T-4-2 said:
Of course she gave the OK. I'm sure the words "documentary filmmaker" made her little ears prick right up. She's probably hoping for Ken or Ric Burns. Heck, she's probably got the storyboard ready to go (in pencil).

Sheriff Joe doesn't always come off well in the media, but I'm so glad Jodi ended up in his jail.
Click to expand...
I'm afraid it may be more than just hearing about a documentary. See my post today in the Sidebar thread for some interesting connections
 
T-4-2 said:
Do you have a wireless keyboard in your lap? And a cat? That can sometimes result in unintentional characters if part of the cat is on part of the keyboard.

Or it could be an indication that you typed a really long "bad word" that was automatically censored.
Click to expand...

No it's my wireless keyboard. Haha.
 
MeeBee said:
So I was followed by Acquit Jodi Ann on Twitter. I went to block them because...no. And before I did I saw this:

@JodiAnnArias: It's official: Jodi is not representing herself anymore.

Hmmmmm...
Click to expand...

Aw, c'mon. She couldn't even make it through jury selection? :floorlaugh: Honestly, I think this has to do with her witnesses (or lack thereof).

Is this penalty phase retrial going to as much as get off the ground?!
 
janx said:
Aw, c'mon. She couldn't even make it through jury selection? :floorlaugh: Honestly, I think this has to do with her witnesses (or lack thereof).

Is this penalty phase retrial going to as much as get off the ground?!
Click to expand...

Someone on the sidebar said this might have something to do with the witness interviews that just happened OR the PI didn't find what she was looking for and she backed out. Doubt well found out the truth, though. They'll just say it was all Juan's fault. Personally I think it's a combination of all this and her not getting her way in preventing Juan from interviewing her witnesses.
 
Good news. Since she hates Nurmi and he doesn't like her nine days out of ten, maybe he can speed this trial up a bit and get on with his life so she can be sent away. I can dream.
 
Is there a tentative date for this thing to start? It was supposed to start tomorrow, IIRC. It keeps getting put off and put off. Do they have a date yet for it, at all.
 
Steely Dan said:
Is there a tentative date for this thing to start? It was supposed to start tomorrow, IIRC. It keeps getting put off and put off. Do they have a date yet for it, at all.
Click to expand...

Yes they rescheduled it because Jodi wouldn't turn over witness lists in time. It's now slated for 9/29.
 
If true the convicted murder has stepped down I wonder if we are back to Nurmi strategy or will her DT carry-on with the murders plan.

I don't want to see another delay but I'm sure hiccups are right around the corner.
 
Curious in Indiana said:
Know what I am thinking? If The killer is no longer representing herself, it's because of sheriff joes letter. She wants that movie made and she wants cameras in the courtroom. Regardless what she claimed earlier. JMO.
Click to expand...

I thought the letter requesting to meet her for the documentary was from last March?
 
Curious in Indiana said:
Good news. Since she hates Nurmi and he doesn't like her nine days out of ten, maybe he can speed this trial up a bit and get on with his life so she can be sent away. I can dream.
Click to expand...

The only good thing if Nurmi gets it back is that I am sure he is wanting this over with just as much as we are. I dont think even he would want to drag things out like he did the last time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is DeKalb County John Doe (2022)?

Members online

... and 152 more.
Total: 2,093 (members: 153, guests: 1,940)

Online statistics

Members online
153
Guests online
1,940
Total visitors
2,093
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
603,997
Messages
18,166,455
Members
231,905
Latest member
kristens5487
Back
Top