JM can bring it up, but he can't say CMJA slashed the tires, since she wasn't charged or caught in the act. Can't be proven.
He can offer that hypothesis now since the defense opened the door. He couldn't introduce it before, but he can respond to it now.
Wishing all the WS'ers a Merry Christmas and good times spent with loved ones and friends.
Special thanks to all the Mod's whose dedication to this site is so appreciated. :yourock::blowkiss:
Does anyone think the transcripts of the secret testimony will become available soon?
Anyone subscribing to BK know if she will request them? tia.
Dmacky--I still shake my head in disbelief every time I see CMJA's robotic, Powerpoint allocution. :facepalm:
After yesterday's BS...I could not stop thinking about her brief time representing herself. What would she have been allowed to have access to during this time?
:seeya: Good morning all. Even though my brain is still frazzled from this week's testi-agony, I couldn't help but hope that today is still a scheduled court administration Friday, and perhaps, just perhaps, the testimony might be released. I'm going to pop in and out to check.
Per the suspicious journals, my hinky metre went off the first time I saw excerpts on Nancy Grace. Remember those never ending nightly 'bombshell' episodes on JA? I've always felt that on her return to Cal. she took her original 2008 journal and edited it into a new one, to be read just in case she was ever caught. I don't think she had thoughts then of DV or pedo, but was intent on making Travis appear 'mean', both for spite, and to make it appear that she had broken away from him for good. Maybe great chunks were considered too prejudicial to be introduced by Juan, but IIRC we never heard mention of entries when she first met Travis; nor of her preparing for the 'trip'. Both of those times would have been very important for her to note.
:seeya: Good morning all.
Even though my brain is still frazzled from this week's testi-agony,
I couldn't help but hope that today is still a scheduled court administration Friday, and perhaps, just perhaps, the testimony might be released. I'm going to pop in and out to check.
Per the suspicious journals, my hinky metre went off the first time I saw excerpts on Nancy Grace. Remember those never ending nightly 'bombshell' episodes on JA? I've always felt that on her return to Cal. she took her original 2008 journal and edited it into a new one, to be read just in case she was ever caught. I don't think she had thoughts then of DV or pedo, but was intent on making Travis appear 'mean', both for spite, and to make it appear that she had broken away from him for good. Maybe great chunks were considered too prejudicial to be introduced by Juan, but IIRC we never heard mention of entries when she first met Travis; nor of her preparing for the 'trip'. Both of those times would have been very important for her to note.
That makes perfect sense - not that she wrote it from scratch, but that she rewrote her original one to suit her later needs.
RBBM:
:hilarious: :hilarious: "testi-agony" !
Perfect word for this past week's testiphony !
:cheers: You are too funny, NP !