http://www.fox30online.com/media/news/e/4/2/e42078af-0580-47ab-8b13-b60c9d0f9ac3/cummings1.pdf
This is the recorded hearing on December 27th 2005
On Page #44 line 22-25 & Page #45 line 1 - 18
RC's is speaking in regards to criminal records he has on hand regarding Crystal & her mother. He says in line 13 & 14.
After reading the judge did not have the arrest records in front of him, he still went ahead and made the judgement. He said that will not play a part in his decision- Huge red flag at a custody hearing- imo.
He did not have the DCF reports for him to consider either parties, he said those were also hearsay. He did have CS certificate of parenting classes.
I read the entire document- he was granted custody based on he had an income. (although where it was stated about him having "other" income, raised the hairs on my neck)
SO heres my point: RC arrest record extends from 1999 to the present - as shown in the document thread.
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3309732&postcount=5
Why would RC make a statement aknowledging he has a record, but omitting recent criminal history. And the Judge, didnt have any of that before him to consider ??? Whoa! Where was DCF when this hearing took place?
CS- filed a motion to refute the Judges ruling on January 4th, 2006
I do not know anything of what happened after that.
IMO-RC was not exactly forthcoming. On the other hand, the despondant was candid, uneducated for all I can say. It's pretty sad that the system didnt see fit to make a ruling based on many factors. Money? Its important, health care is important......heck even I had all that.....and I was still abused, molested and repeatedly denied my truth (secondary wounding- by a judge no less)... (Oh yes, I was told I was loved too,... love should not fail you or put you in a bad environment.) Its a failed system in many cases. DCF needs to change too.
Poor Haleigh.