fortytwo
What was the question?
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
- Messages
- 1,285
- Reaction score
- 0
I did a little searching and found something which bothers me a little.
It seems the original story from the Tracy Press about the police looking into these 60 people has been removed. I can't find it anywhere on the Web.
http://tracypress.com/content/view/17700/2268/
("File not found")
It's gone from the Protect.org site too. ("Story not currently available.")
http://www.protect.org/Where-are-the-Tracy-60.html
I found this from another message board with the original story link:
http://boards.insessiontrials.com/showthread.php?t=351391
04-03-2009, 04:14 AM
Maelstrom5
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Milford, Connecticut
Posts: 1,059
Police scrutinize viewers of child *advertiser censored*
http://tracypress.com/content/view/17700/2268/
"Computer-savvy cops in Tracy have identified about 60 people who view or exchange child *advertiser censored*, and police say they get extra attention as investigators search for the missing Sandra Cantu, 8..."
What's bothering me is why this original story which broke the news about the Tracy 60 has vanished...
___
Stories disappear all the time when you have a high profile case. Who knows why? It could be as simple as space for other stories.![]()
I know on our local news sites, stories are dropped from the website frequently.
ETA: I do wish we could keep the Tracy60 talk on that specific thread. It has in no way been connected to this case yet.
I'm not saying that it is the case in this instance, but another common reason for news outlets to pull something from their websites is because they were wrong.Yes, but it seems to be the ONLY story and now it's gone. Every other mention of it on the Web refers to it as the factual source.
At least that's what I've been able to discern from searching so far.
They are not always up front enough to post a correction or retraction.
After the fictional cat is out of the fabricated bag the original never quite goes away, it just becomes an unattributable 'reliable source'.
I won't go into dreary details, but the second half of my sig. is based on exactly such an episode.