ProfCluezo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2024
- Messages
- 412
- Reaction score
- 3,469
From what I understand the reason it was finally deemed “suspicious” was because of the lack of any evidence of Samantha’s “disappearance”… the ABSENCE of ANY leads qualified as being unusually “suspicious”, as opposed to the PRESENCE of information suggesting any specific “suspicious” circumstances… (if that makes sense??). It is a paradox. The complete absence of ANY info/leads/sightings WAS the suspicious factor…
Last edited: