IMO, he had already figured out where to take the body. He thought he had it all figured out.
Also, he is pleading not guilty. So why would he say anything?
JMO
He , that is, his Barrister ,
has not made any plea at all. To anyone. I don't know where this info that he has pled not guilty has arisen, it has not happened. He has been assigned , ( most probably ) or has had a Barrister employed by his solicitor to manage his case, because Murder is a Supreme Court matter and requires the services of a Barrister.
( for Americans, the word Barrister equals a particular kind of attorney, a specialised Trial Attorney would be the closest level )
How the law works in Victoria, AU. Stephenson cannot be made to make any plea at all. By any method, coercion, or persuasion. It is entirely up to him, he is well within his constitutional rights to not say a single word, at any time.
At some point in the progression of the court, he will be asked how he intends to plead. He can still say nothing. This point, wherein he is asked what his plea will be has not happened yet, and won't happen until the Summary, and maybe not even then, might be a Second Summary . what has happened is a Mention,.. this is the point at which this event is up to currently.
In this instance, when it gets to the Summary point, and maybe a bit further on, the judge makes the call, and when the judge does it, it is ALWAYS 'not guilty' and the trial in the Supreme Court begins, without his input but he must attend. At any time , he can change that plea.
A guilty plea would attract a certain pro rata discount on the time served before applying for parole. This is the carrot part of the plea.
A not guilty plea dispenses with that discount, and if found guilty, no discount is assigned. This is the stick part of the plea.