SouthAussie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 30,310
- Reaction score
- 186,384
Hmmm....
"Criminal psychologist Tim Watson-Munro
believes police are remaining overly tight-lipped for one reason –
they think someone else is involved.
Mr Watson-Munro told he believes another person was involved in the disposal of her phone at the dam,
as it was in good condition when it was found.
'Of all the dams in that district
on all the farms in that district
they happen to find it there,
and as I understand it,
pretty well preserved',
he said.
'Clearly,
this raises the likelihood of third-party involvement because by then the accused was in custody'.
The psychologist said police were likely withholding information in hopes of 'shaking' someone down.
'I suspect someone took the phone there
and police have intelligence on that.
Leaking or providing developments to the public is inevitably strategic',
he said."
Real reason mum’s body hasn’t been found
As yet another police search for Samatha Murphy’s body comes to a close, the community of Ballarat – as well as the rest of Australia – are demanding answers more than ever before.www-news-com-au.cdn.ampproject.org
'Of all the dams in that district on all the farms in that district they happen to find it there, and as I understand it, pretty well preserved', he said.
Where did Mr Tim Watson-Munro think the police would find the phone? Does he have a preconceived notion?
(Google will tell you more about him.)
Does he think that someone else dumped the phone there, then tipped the police where it is, but they still needed to take along a technology dog because they wouldn't see it laying there, exposed in the dried mud?
Last edited: