Sandra Bullock moves out of family home

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
If it's not child abuse, it's teaching the child about sexual exploitation. They're getting an early education about what sexual perversions look like imo. Children pick up what's going on. JJ is providing his children an education. He has a 12 year old. Problem is it will seem personal to his children not just as if they are taking a Comparative/lifestyle education class or something. Their dad's choices have just affected their lives too - would you be proud of your dad if this was national news and you were a little kid?

I concur, JJ's behavior may not fall concretely into the definition of child abuse but he's not a good role model imo. If you think that what a child's parents do doesn't affect their children then that's your opinion. I happen to believe a parent's behavior affects their children either positively or negatively.


totally correct...The education they are getting from learning who he is - is deeply harmful.
 
IMHO I still do not buy that Sondra had no idea who this pig JJ really is.

I will say I totally loved Sondra, the day before this messy story broke out. Now I am taking a back step, once I begin to doubt, or mistrust, I wait to see the story more clearly.
I am reserving my opinion because I do believe she knew far more about JJ then she has led us to believe.
 
totally correct...The education they are getting from learning who he is - is deeply harmful.

Again, the courts will look at this from a legal standpoint. Affairs are not reason to take a child away from a parent.

Sandra is not going to seek custody. Would you rather a stranger raise these children than the natural father? (I don't see the mother(s) as having permanent custody.)
 
So - given JJ and Tiger, how many other celebs are out there sweating bullets waiting for someone to expose their indiscretions? Who would you be shocked to find out they had a double life going?
 
Again, the courts will look at this from a legal standpoint. Affairs are not reason to take a child away from a parent.

Sandra is not going to seek custody. Would you rather a stranger raise these children than the natural father? (I don't see the mother(s) as having permanent custody.)

Sandra obviously isn't a stranger to these children.
 
IMHO I still do not buy that Sondra had no idea who this pig JJ really is.

I will say I totally loved Sondra, the day before this messy story broke out. Now I am taking a back step, once I begin to doubt, or mistrust, I wait to see the story more clearly.
I am reserving my opinion because I do believe she knew far more about JJ then she has led us to believe.

who is Sondra?

I don't think Sandra would have married someone she did not trust completely.
 
I saw an interview recently that Sandra had done. I can't remember who did the interview (maybe it was the Barbara Walters interview) but anyway, the interviewer asked Sandra how her name was pronounced - "Sandra or Sondra" and she said "SANDRA" and went on to say that she had no idea how the pronunciation "Sondra" got started but it did and took off. However, it's Sandra. Just thought I'd put that out there.
 
So - given JJ and Tiger, how many other celebs are out there sweating bullets waiting for someone to expose their indiscretions? Who would you be shocked to find out they had a double life going?

These women who are having affairs with these married celebrities are really making me sick. To have an affair with a married man is bad enough, but then these women go out and sell their stories to the tabloids. Is this the new way to make a quick buck and to get famous?

The flip side of that is that the media is paying big bucks for these stories and having these disgusting creatures on day in day out - on tv, in print, doing interviews. I'm all about freedom of speech & freedom of the press, but my gosh...does it have to be on the national news and cable news channels every single night? Can't this stuff stay in the tabloids like it used to? What is all of this teaching us? our children? I guess it just really irks me that these lowlifes (the mistresses) can come out after the affair and make a nice buck or two by spilling all their dirty secrets. It has been reported that Bombshell got $30,000.00 for her first interview with InTouch. And then she'll probably get on some t.v. show making more money. It's like she is being rewarded for her adulterous/sleazy/exploitive behavior.:banghead:
 
While I agree that it's despicable that women are taking celebs/politicians to the cleaners, it's pretty obvious that the men are just plain stupid.

The men can't figure out that these women are after $ and fame? I'm guess they don't care and think they can get away with anything. Let's not blame the women when the men should be taking responsibility for themselves, their families, and their children instead of running around.
 
While I agree that it's despicable that women are taking celebs/politicians to the cleaners, it's pretty obvious that the men are just plain stupid.

The men can't figure out that these women are after $ and fame? I'm guess they don't care and think they can get away with anything. Let's not blame the women when the men should be taking responsibility for themselves, their families, and their children instead of running around.
I'm blaming everyone involved. The man for cheating, the woman for having an adulterous relationship, going public with it for a buck etc, and the media for paying these women. I think it's all dispicable.
 
snipped from Roselvr's post in which she said:

I don't see what having ink on one's body has to do with raising a child and being a bad parent.. the drugs & the sex are different stories because I would be humiliated if my mother was in the *advertiser censored* business.

As far as what a child wants; they want the people that love them in their life no matter what the person has done (sex/drugs)

For women like we have been talking about who are tattooed all over, and it still shows even when they are fully dressed, I think it can effect a child.

Once children hit school, then many of them want their parents to look like the parents of all their friends. When they look different, meaning significantly different, then the child can become embarrassed because of that difference and not really want their parents to come to the school for different functions. The child make think it is cool at home but not out in front of their friends. JMO
 
snipped from Roselvr's post in which she said:

I don't see what having ink on one's body has to do with raising a child and being a bad parent.. the drugs & the sex are different stories because I would be humiliated if my mother was in the *advertiser censored* business.

As far as what a child wants; they want the people that love them in their life no matter what the person has done (sex/drugs)

For women like we have been talking about who are tattooed all over, and it still shows even when they are fully dressed, I think it can effect a child.

Once children hit school, then many of them want their parents to look like the parents of all their friends. When they look different, meaning significantly different, then the child can become embarrassed because of that difference and not really want their parents to come to the school for different functions. The child make think it is cool at home but not out in front of their friends. JMO
Parents embarass kids regardless, again, what does ink have to do with being a bad parent? :waitasec:
 
IMHO I still do not buy that Sondra had no idea who this pig JJ really is.

I will say I totally loved Sondra, the day before this messy story broke out. Now I am taking a back step, once I begin to doubt, or mistrust, I wait to see the story more clearly.
I am reserving my opinion because I do believe she knew far more about JJ then she has led us to believe.

I am having to lean a bit toward songlines post here and agree with her now that I think this over after a couple of days and it has set in. Sandra knew about some of the pigs past so how much did she really know about what was going on in his life? I, in no way blame her at all. But, I think there is probably more to the private side of this story then the public will find out. I am sure things have not been good between them for quite sometime and she had to know a bit about what was coming. I don't think she was in the dark.

I say get rid of the pig quickly and move on. She is one beautiful woman, inside and out and doesn't need this to go on everyday. He is pure dirt and this story gets worse everytime someone tells more of it.


Goz
Happy Easter All
 
I feel sorry for Sandra. I hope she sets a new trend and dumps his sorry butt. It is so disappointing when men act like over the top scoundrels and the women stick with them. Hilary, Elan etc. It sets such a poor example for young women. There are plenty-o-fish in the sea and I for one think it's best to move on and find a more true mate. That's just me though. Sandra must be reeling, coming down from an Oscar high to the lowest of the lows. Poor girl!
 
The more things come out the more I have to agree...Sandra could NOT have totally been "in the dark" regarding her nasty hubby

I hope she has the sense to not take him back...he goes beyond the usual philandering celeb...some of the neo nazi stuff is really disgusting, also his *advertiser censored* connections, strippers...and weird fetish stuff. Low down freaky IMHO

I could not stand this surly arrogant man when he was on the Celebrity Apprentice..yeah it's a stupid show but the other celebs get into the spirit and do raise money for charity....Jesse was arrogant and selfish and didn't raise a dime.
 
The more things come out the more I have to agree...Sandra could NOT have totally been "in the dark" regarding her nasty hubby

I hope she has the sense to not take him back...he goes beyond the usual philandering celeb...some of the neo nazi stuff is really disgusting, also his *advertiser censored* connections, strippers...and weird fetish stuff. Low down freaky IMHO

I could not stand this surly arrogant man when he was on the Celebrity Apprentice..yeah it's a stupid show but the other celebs get into the spirit and do raise money for charity....Jesse was arrogant and selfish and didn't raise a dime.

I disagree. She goes on location to shoot her movies, so it would be easier to keep her in the dark than if she were at home every day.
 
Movers Arrive at Home Once Shared by Sandra and Jesse
http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity...t-home-once-shared-by-sandra-and-jesse-197031 Ok I just have to say some of theses comments after the story trouble me. How can you blame Sandra :banghead: I dont care if she knew what the man was like. Love is blind and she probably believed her love could change him. Why is it some blame the women but if it were reversed and she did it while on a movie shoot she would be a sl*t. Sorry for the rant but it hit a nerve:crazy:
 
I am having to lean a bit toward songlines post here and agree with her now that I think this over after a couple of days and it has set in. Sandra knew about his some of the pigs past so how much did she really know about what was going on in his life? I, in no way blame her at all. But, I think there is probably more to the private side of this story then the public will find out. I am sure things have not been good between them for quite sometime and she had to know a bit about what was coming. I don't think she was in the dark.

I say get rid of the pig quickly and move on. She is one beautiful woman, inside and out and doesn't need this to go on everyday. He is pure dirt and this story gets worse everytime someone tells more of it.


Goz
Happy Easter All
As far as his affairs go, I would think she had no clue. Conisdering the amount of movies she puts out, she was probably gone a lot, leaving him free to roam. Meaning, when they were together he was probably the model husband. I do think she knew about the sexual harrasment settlement, how could a spouse not know that (which was something he could probably tell a few lies on and explain away, like the girl was out for money, etc) or if he was or was not a white supremacist.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
170
Guests online
373
Total visitors
543

Forum statistics

Threads
609,300
Messages
18,252,304
Members
234,604
Latest member
OTHAFADannielle
Back
Top