MIBRO
Inactive
Gary Merriman (Access Graphics) was asked for SEVEN handwriting samples. Do you think there were some "similarities" to the RN?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by Toth
There are a variety of theories about this case, some of them so absurd as to be humorus.
WHAT DO THE BOULDER KIDS SAY THESE DAYS???
I don't think we need deal with the really far out stuff such as Patsy killed JonBenet when she suddenly realized JonBenet was going to grow up to be too short for the Miss America Pageant.
I don't think we deal with the 'kiled for the insurance money' since there was no insurance policy and the Ramseys have spent a small fortune on lawyers and investigators.
But for those of you who think this was a murder by a pedophile, what about saitey?
Has he not killed since?
Has he killed in a different manner?
Why was there 'minimal' sexual activity compared to what is often done to such vicitms both before and after death?
If the garotte was fashioned so as to prolong the death, did this particular crime fully satisfy his blood lust?
Originally posted by Ivy
The intruder would also know every nuance of Patsy's handwriting in order to mimic it in the ransom note.
Toth, have you viewed the documents showing Patsy's exemplars next to the handwriting in the ransom note? My guess is that you haven't, and that you don't want to.
\\Originally posted by Ivy
The intruder would also know every nuance of Patsy's handwriting in order to mimic it in the ransom note.
Toth, have you viewed the documents showing Patsy's exemplars next to the handwriting in the ransom note? My guess is that you haven't, and that you don't want to.
Originally posted by Blazeboy3
Originally posted by Nedthan Johns
....................any good investigator could NOT IMO rule Pasty, John NOR Burke out as possible suspects. There is just NO conclusive evidence that ANY intruder entered or exited the home that night.
Originally posted by MIBRO
Ned: The unidentifiable DNA was never run through Codis. It can only be used to exclude a suspect, it cannot identify one.
Would you be good enough to explain this statement? WHY was the BPD submitting suspects' DNA for comparison, if the DNA can only exclude? Do you not think they hoped for (and still hope for) a match? If I understand your statement correctly, you are saying that if they had a sample of the killer's DNA, that the only result they could get is exclusion, not a match. Does that make sense?