Honestly, I don't like some aspects of this eye witness claim:
- He seems to indicate that the victim was held captive by a group of criminals for days. During this time, they make little effort to conceal what they are doing. As such, any number of rean and wanan'be drug dealers, drug buyers, drug couriers and bored but criminally included that would go by the drop house. Articles have mentioned that this is a 'stash house' therefore, in my opinion, the exact activity you describe is exactly what one would expect there...those going there would have trouble narcing on a crime whilst committing a crime, IMO
- His recounting of the murder seems fragmented. I would guess 'we' are only hearing part of the story The victim tries to escape, they murder her. Sounds realistic to me, murder the witness (Britt) The witness does not immediately leave as one would think hisa ction would be. See previous red...I don't think a witness walks away easily from such a situation Instead, he continues to loiter at the house and sees the murders again making little attempt to conceal the crime, this has gone unsolved for 7 years, pretty well concealed to meremove the victim's body. Following the murder, none of those involved brag to any friends i personally saw this exact scenario discussed in social media prior to this announcement, girl friends, hookers or junior gangsters in training. Likewise, nobody in the neighborhood reports suspicions of the crime out of any number of motivations (morality, desire for a reward, personal dislike of those involved etc) or for fear of being murdered (and worse) and fed to alligators
Even if a casual drug culture witness was not morally motivated to report the crime (and some such people do have a personal code of ethics)to the police, he would have plenty of other motivations. These would include the reward, the need for a favor from the police or proscecutors, a falling out with his former assosciates, or "just because". Yet, the witness and other possible witnesses don't report the murderers for eight years.
Undoubtably, something terrible happened to the poor girl. It is very possible that the witness does know who murdered the victim in general terms, but for other motivations, wants to include as many people in the claim as possible. Thus, he might be adding to the truth, perhaps to implicate as many rivals as possible. I wonder if the FBI has vetted this account, or is the witnesses reliability the conclusion of one agent?I am guessing the FBI has been thorough, IMO