And there is a link on that link with the list:
http://www.wmbfnews.com/story/24331448/questions-surround-the-human-remains-found-on-tidewater-rd
I noticed there are people who are not from Horry county - also Georgetown, Florence, Dillon & Marion counties are included.
I'll have to take a look, thanks for the info. Could they have gone MISSING in Horry County, but not lived there?
Ok been getting caught up and something is gnawing at me. We know that HE talked to her roomie and they talked about old, married [modsnip] or whatever we are calling him, so if O.M.[modsnip] (LOL I just cracked myself up with that) convinced HE to meet or whatever wouldn't you think that HE would at least text her roomie something like "[modsnip] won't stop pushing, gonna go meet him, wish me luck." Or something like that? Young girls share EVERYTHING that happens in their lives. I know that I did.
I could see:
OM contacting HE and saying, don't tell anyone, meet me at X, and HE maybe thinking OM was going to tell her something important, so she would wait to find out what OM wanted to say before calling anyone.
OR OM contacting HE and wanting to return something of hers she had, and HE not wanting OM anywhere near her home, so arranging to get whatever at PTL (or somewhere else).
OR HE possibly having something that belonged to OM and wanting to return it arranged to do so at PTL (or somewhere else to keep him away from her home)
Just saying that the whole "X would not give back my Y", seems to always come after the fact for the only 2 girls I can reference (17 and 20).
I think "somewhere else" being the key here.
One thing that really stands out to me is why she didn't have whomever she was meeting up with come to her place. She was home alone, didn't have anywhere to be and if it was someone she trusted (per TE's theory) would it be a big deal if they knew where she lived and/or stopped over? Just curious.
If she no longer wanted anything to do with the person, she wouldn't want them at her place. Or if she didn't trust herself to be alone with said person, because logically she knew she should not be with the person, but still had feelings for said person, she wouldn't want them at her place. Or if it was someone who was related/friend of someone she trusted or once trusted, but she didn't trust the relative/friend at all, she would not want that person at her home.
Which has me wondering why Heather held on to her phone instead of passing it to her date for him to use her phone to take the picture. Maybe she was receiving calls/texts that she didn't want her date to see??
Here is a scenario I have been a party to: Person x is driving the car, removes phone from purse hands it to me and asks me to take picture of them driving beefy 4 wheel drive over drop off. Me having no idea how to use their phone and make sure I save the picture. Me telling them I will take the picture with my own phone and send it to them. Person X then sits their phone in their lap because it is somehow harder to get the phone INTO the purse, than OUT of the purse. (In this case, phone ends up on the floor, but that is another story)
If Heather's phone last pinged at PTL where the car was found, is there any reason LE would continue to not comment on the last phone ping location ?
Is there any reason Heather's family would not release the phone ping location if it was the same place as the car was found ? Or any reason the last phone ping was not mentioned in myhorrynews with the police report ?
If LE mentions when/where the last phone ping is/was, then someone can create an alibi for exactly that time. If they don't mention it, there is still the possibility of another time/place/type of "electronic communication" (who knows where I got that one from?) being on the table.
