There was a bill introduced to the state Senate in December 2021, but it wasn’t passed before the deadline. The proposed bill actually laid out what actions would constitute coercive control and the evidence that could be used to prove such behavior in a very clear cut manner.
(2) The offense of coercive control of another person may include, but is not limited to, the following types of behavior:
(a)
isolating a person from their friends and family;
(b) depriving a person of basic needs;
(c)
monitoring a person's time;
(d)
monitoring a person via online communication tools or using spyware;
(e)
taking control over aspects of a person's everyday life, including where the person may go,
who the person may see, what a person may wear, and
when a person may sleep;
(f) depriving a person access to support services, including medical services;
(g)
repeatedly insulting a person, including expressing the person's worthlessness;
(h)
enforcing rules and activities that humiliate, degrade, or dehumanize the person;
(i) forcing a person to take part in criminal activity, including shoplifting and neglect or abuse of children, to encourage the person's self-blame and prevent disclosure to authorities;
(j) financial abuse, including
control of finances and only allowing a person a punitive allowance;
(k)
threats to hurt or kill;
(l) threats to a child;
(m)
threats to reveal or publish private information or extort the person or a member of the person's family in retaliation by legal or other means;
(n) assault;
(o) rape; or
(p)
preventing a person from having access to transport or from working.
(3) Evidence of coercive control of another person may include, but is not limited to, the following:
(a) copies of
emails, phone records, or text messages;
(b)
evidence of abuse over the Internet, digital technology, or social media platforms;
(c) evidence of assault;
(d) photographs of injuries, particularly defensive injuries to forearms, latent upper arm grabs, scalp bruising, or clumps of hair missing;
(e)
911 tapes or transcripts;
(f)
body-worn camera footage;
(g) lifestyle and household evidence, including at-scene photographic evidence;
(h)
records of interaction with support services or law enforcement, including records of interaction prior to the current incident or investigation;
(i)
medical records;
(j)
witness testimony, including testimony from the family and friends, regarding the effect and impact of isolation of the person from friends or family, or other local witnesses with relevant observations of the person;
(k)
bank records to show financial control;
(l)
previous threats made to children or
other family members;
(m)
diary kept by the person;
(n) the person's account of the situation to law enforcement; or
(o)
evidence of isolation such as lack of contact between family and friends, person withdrawing from activities such as clubs and other life events including weddings and funerals, and the person exerting control accompanying the person to medical appointments.
I’m very annoyed that South Carolina allowed that bill to die without taking action.
Which countries have coercive control bills? Track and learn more about the bills and what they cover.
www.theacecc.com
Some interesting and helpful information at the above link. There are several countries and other US states that have already passed coercive control laws.
France was the first in 2010. Followed by Wales and the UK in 2015. Ireland and Scotland — which has the most extensive laws on coercive control — in 2018.
In the states, Hawaii and California signed into law coercive control bills in 2020. Connecticut signed “Jennifer’s Law” in 2021, which expanded the state’s definition of domestic violence to include coercive control. The bill is named in honor of Jennifer Dulos.
Others states and countries with pending coercive control legislation include Washington, Florida, New York, Maryland, and Australia.