Data Sleuth
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2021
- Messages
- 90
- Reaction score
- 946
With regard to law enforcement declaring that “there is no threat to the public” on the evening of the murders. After some research I concluded that the officer or investigator that is in charge of the crime scene makes that judgement call.
It is the lead LE person who must assess the factors present (crime scene evidence: whether there an active shooter?; is it a murder/suicide?; was a weapon used in the commission of a crime present at the crime scene etc.
In my opinion since there are rumors that both PM and MM were shot at close range, coupled with the possibility that other evidence that we are unaware of-
1)weapons present at the crime scene.
2)possible break in to the main house or caretakers residence.
3 perhaps tire tracks left by a vehicle that was used in commission of the murders and had left the scene.
These items allowed the lead investigator/LE to make the conclusion that it was a targeted hit and there was no threat to the public.
After all, what else could they do after doing a quick sweep of the area to ensure that there was no threat at the property ?
They very well could not have issued a BOLO because that did not have a description of the shooter(s) or vehicles to put out to the general public.
These are just my opinions.
It is the lead LE person who must assess the factors present (crime scene evidence: whether there an active shooter?; is it a murder/suicide?; was a weapon used in the commission of a crime present at the crime scene etc.
In my opinion since there are rumors that both PM and MM were shot at close range, coupled with the possibility that other evidence that we are unaware of-
1)weapons present at the crime scene.
2)possible break in to the main house or caretakers residence.
3 perhaps tire tracks left by a vehicle that was used in commission of the murders and had left the scene.
These items allowed the lead investigator/LE to make the conclusion that it was a targeted hit and there was no threat to the public.
After all, what else could they do after doing a quick sweep of the area to ensure that there was no threat at the property ?
They very well could not have issued a BOLO because that did not have a description of the shooter(s) or vehicles to put out to the general public.
These are just my opinions.