This one might be a reach..
Paul’s death prevented him from being tried and possibly found guilty of three felonies in the fatal boating accident.
AM and BM are being sued by Philadelphia Indemnity (in response to a coverage claim made by AM and BM pertaining to the accident). Philadelphia Indemnity is claiming that given the circumstances, they have no duty to defend or indemnify the two Murdaughs in the Beach lawsuit (this from an earlier post on this thread by clearskies 1).
Although Paul was not named in the civil suit, could the fact that he now cannot be convicted of the three boating under the influence felonies have any impact on whether Philadelphia Indemnity might have to honor/pay the Murdaugh’s claim? If so, there might be a motive there..
All complete conjecture
Paul’s death prevented him from being tried and possibly found guilty of three felonies in the fatal boating accident.
AM and BM are being sued by Philadelphia Indemnity (in response to a coverage claim made by AM and BM pertaining to the accident). Philadelphia Indemnity is claiming that given the circumstances, they have no duty to defend or indemnify the two Murdaughs in the Beach lawsuit (this from an earlier post on this thread by clearskies 1).
Although Paul was not named in the civil suit, could the fact that he now cannot be convicted of the three boating under the influence felonies have any impact on whether Philadelphia Indemnity might have to honor/pay the Murdaugh’s claim? If so, there might be a motive there..
All complete conjecture