I am 998.99999999% sure he did it, but physical evidence from what I have heard is iffy. Then again I haven't gone into super details either. From listening to some lawyers talking about it they all think he probably did, but the state didn't have significant physical proof. It also doesn't help that jurors aren't allowed to take notes. Overall I hope that he is found guilty, but to me when looking at the law from what I have learned he definitely knew what to do with the evidence (clothing, guns, etc) and probably had help/influence in them not doing full search. I have heard they let the house be cleaned the next day and that the drains weren't swabbed, etc.
I am also feeling that unfortunately this man has a reputation and influence that goes wide that even if the jurors say they are impartial they may be influenced by this master manipulator and wouldn't put it past them. I am going with 99% think he is guilty, but depending on peoples view on "reasonable doubt" it will be hung jury