VERDICT WATCH SC - Paul Murdaugh & mom Margaret Found Shot To Death - Alex Murdaugh Accused - Islandton #35

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
geevee said:
My understanding is that AM represented BB in some legal matters and BB signed over Moselle as payment, I never did a deep dive into their connection, all of it seemed quite illicit and tangled. FITS also did a podcast on them and a 'bonus video':

https://twitter.com/x/status/1491480765783228423
Click to expand...

I've not listened to the BB YT but I did catch a short network interview with a physician who opined that AM's alleged quantity of oxy abuse led him to believe that AM's pills would not be by some street distribution but by a high-level network involved in pharma-grade theft with insider participation. Insiders to possibly include pharmacists and the record keepers of batch numbers of the released controlled substance Rx.

IMO, this actually makes the most sense to me given both the $$$$ and the alleged daily quantity and how AM seemed fearless about what he was ingesting. In other words, AM was far too confident in the product he carried in his pocket! JMO
 
I am not Sherlock H. said:
And I think someone else mentioned earlier that with all the phone activity or something, things on and off, there was a worm hole or something the like on that estate or near the kennels? Suggested it needed to be studied thoroughly scientifically. (Sadly I am not doing the original poster justice.)
MO.
Click to expand...

Lol, that was me, and that's what I said, time slows down over there, it's like the Bermuda Triangle at Moselle. :p
 
Edvis said:
We made it out as well and headed back to the train. We took some bird strikes, hog hits and nuts from the first wave of squirrel attacks. Chickens got shell shock now and the fellow sleuths held up well but we all need a long stiff drink, again.
Click to expand...
I was late, I missed the bus earlier, I'm not mad, I'm not...and no, those are not acorns in my pockets nor feathers in my bag...honest:rolleyes:
 
bestill said:
That jury verdict was as disappointing as the OJ verdict. I will never forget that trial!
Click to expand...
It was disappointing, but I understand why the jury did what they did. If different charges were given to them to consider, she would have been found guilty on those. It was the specific charge they didn't agree with and couldn't find her guilty of that.
 
I have been waiting for the prosecution’s closing argument since the early days of testimony. I felt that the order of witnesses left a bit to be desired in the way of allowing the jury to follow what actually happened. I get that they have to lay foundations and bring certain witnesses in to admit certain evidence and such. I am not criticizing the way the case was presented - only making an observation that these things just don’t always allow a jury to follow the scenario very well. I am hoping for a clear and concise step by step summary of the prosecution’s view of the events of June 7th from AM’s time at the firm that day until LE arrived on scene after the 911 call.
 
Alright bartender...line 'em up. 1st round is on me!! Might be a long boring afternoon as I'm sure the jury will be getting a heap of instructions in lawyerese w/ a lot of translation. Might be the only way get thru the afternoon without dying of boredom. Cheers ya'll!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 74 more.
Total: 249 (members: 75, guests: 174)

Online statistics

Members online
75
Guests online
174
Total visitors
249
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
608,832
Messages
18,246,190
Members
234,461
Latest member
Mysterymind
Back
Top