christine2448
Retired WS Staff
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2005
- Messages
- 10,392
- Reaction score
- 344
Had I know it was TS standing next to me, I should have glanced over at him and said: "Who loves you, baby?"
Hahaha...great story!
Had I know it was TS standing next to me, I should have glanced over at him and said: "Who loves you, baby?"
Speaking about the movie "Airplane" (and completely off-topic for this thread):
When the movie Airplane came out in the late 1970's, Annasbro and I went to the opening night at the California Theater on Polk Street in San Francisco. As we were standing in line, a guy with a shaved head came out of the theater and was waiting on the sidewalk for his ride. In the late 1970's, the only two famous people in the world who had a shaved head were Yul Brenner and Telly Savalas. I nudged AB and jokingly said, "Hey, look. It's Telly Savalas." Well, the guy turned toward us and it was Telly Savalas! We revelled for a moment in our star-watching luck, then went in the theater.
Afetr spending a half-hour waiting in line, my first required stop was the men's room. Well, understand that a men's room on Polk Street in SF in the 1970's could be an...interesting...place. (Insert your analysis of me as a homophobe here.) I decided that the best course of action would be to get in, take care of business, and get the hell out as soon as possible. I entered and immediately went to the far left urinal of a bank of five (No one else was in there at the time). I was forcing myself to finish as quickly as possible when I see out of the corner of my eye a big man come in and stand at the urinal right next to me (leaving the three on the right unoccupied). As I pondered my potential fate as some theatergoers love toy, AB came in and went to the urinal just to the right of the other guy. Now this was just too weird - men's room etiquette states that you ALWAYS go the stall farthest away from whoever else was in there (i.e. I go to stall one, new guy goes to stall five, AB then goes to stall three).
I immediately cut short my relief and rushed over to the sink to wash my hands. I glanced in the mirror, trying to process this weird chain of events when it dawned on me that the big guy who had been standing next to me was Telly Savalas, who had returned to the theater. That explained why AB had stood where he did - so he could someday tell his grandchildren that he had peed next to Telly Savalas. And my homophobic paranoia had blinded me from capitalizing on perhaps the all-time greatest setup for a one-liner. Had I know it was TS standing next to me, I should have glanced over at him and said: "Who loves you, baby?"
Exceedingly wise advice, Julessleuther. And much appreciated.Absolutely I understand what you mean. I know my situation is very different, but alittle similar. I was one name and part of a family before the age of 5, but became another name and part of another family after that point. Growing up, my family that I grew up with was my FAMILY, but I still had memories of my original family. That was difficult for me. As an adult, after finding my natural family, the only connection we had to each other was the past--those years we were together. They knew me as the original girl, but I knew myself as the girl I became when I was adopted. My natural mother knew me as her daughter, but I did not know her as my mother(This may be different for C--my mother chose to give me up, and of course Anna was taken from her mother). It was very confusing and emotionally wrenching. Only my older sister and I have been able to have a good relationship because we talked about and dealt with the past, but have moved on and now live in the present and future. My biggest word of advice if C turns out to be Anna is that you talk about the past, you emotionally deal with it, and then you embrace who Anna/C has become and live in the present.
No way am I going on the Springer show! Not if I have to go topless and dance on the pole!
.
Exceedingly wise advice, Julessleuther. And much appreciated.
There is no statute of limitations on kidnapping.
I had a phone call from Congressman Lantos' office this morning. They have left a message with the county supervisor, they now have a file on Anna's case and are checking on the Department of Justice backlog. I wrote to Detective Gilletti at the urging of a former neighbor who stopped by unexpectedly this morning. I know we are very wary of using the psi-word, but this individual gives psychic readings which very often seem to hit on target. She says there is no doubt that Anna is alive.Since the Lindbergh case, kidnapping is a federal crime regardless of whether or not state lines are crossed. Do you know how involved is the FBI is in this matter? If it's considered a state case, there are (at least) two state legal structures to contend with, including the whole matter of extradition (which I don't think the Feds would need to worry about). Also, a federal case may mean it's worth approaching your U. S. Representative and Senators to try to get it off the back burner. "They've waited 35 years, they can wait another 6 months" is not an acceptable attitude, and they need to know that.
...I know we are very wary of using the psi-word, but this individual gives psychic readings which very often seem to hit on target. She says there is no doubt that Anna is alive.
We really have no hard evidence that kidnapping was involved, so it remains a county case. However, there is a file with the FBI (I assume the NCMEC contacted them) and a contact person. But everything hinges on that DNA result right now.Since the Lindbergh case, kidnapping is a federal crime regardless of whether or not state lines are crossed. Do you know how involved is the FBI is in this matter? If it's considered a state case, there are (at least) two state legal structures to contend with, including the whole matter of extradition (which I don't think the Feds would need to worry about). Also, a federal case may mean it's worth approaching your U. S. Representative and Senators to try to get it off the back burner. "They've waited 35 years, they can wait another 6 months" is not an acceptable attitude, and they need to know that.
Yep, it's that same thing about the psi-word, the lack of specifics. Regarding your second comment, it was a little of both. She has spoken about this to me before. She is pushing, pushing for DNA results (as aren't we all?)She didn't happen to also provide Anna's current phone number and address, did she? That would be real helpful... :blushing:
Seriously, did your friend stop by because she had this info, or did she stop by to visit and gave this info in response to your telling her of the recent developments?
My lack of confidence in "the P-word" is often expressed here, but there is something happening here in the last week or so that I intuitively feel that we are very, very close to a answer. I jump each time my cellphone rings, thinking the words: "This is it." And I am more and more optimistic that the news that we will receive will be good news.
Concerning the "knowledge" that Anna is "undoubtedly alive": after the intial optimism of the possible link between Anna and Sharon Marshall, and the "Eiffee" email leads that did not pan out, I unspokenly resigned myself to the concept that this case would be solved by the discovery of an unpublicized Jane Doe eventually being matched up with Anna via DNA. However, each new revelation and discovery has chipped away at that seemingly reasonable belief. I slowly, but inevitably, came to realize that the evidence points toward Anna being alive today. And with recent events, I believe that Annasmom may be having a very memorable Mother's Day this year.
My lack of confidence in "the P-word" is often expressed here, but there is something happening here in the last week or so that I intuitively feel that we are very, very close to a answer. I jump each time my cellphone rings, thinking the words: "This is it." And I am more and more optimistic that the news that we will receive will be good news.
Concerning the "knowledge" that Anna is "undoubtedly alive": after the intial optimism of the possible link between Anna and Sharon Marshall, and the "Eiffee" email leads that did not pan out, I unspokenly resigned myself to the concept that this case would be solved by the discovery of an unpublicized Jane Doe eventually being matched up with Anna via DNA. However, each new revelation and discovery has chipped away at that seemingly reasonable belief. I slowly, but inevitably, came to realize that the evidence points toward Anna being alive today. And with recent events, I believe that Annasmom may be having a very memorable Mother's Day this year.
So you can well imagine that my heart stopped when there was a knock at the door 45 minutes ago and I opened the door to find Detective Gilletti, who had driven from Redwood City through commute traffic to respond to my e-mail. He did not bring news, but rather wanted just to sit down in person and tell me about the phone calls and letters which have been going back and forth between his office, the Sheriff's office and the DOJ this past week. Right now, he is anxious to communicate to the DOJ and their forensic people that many lives are more or less on hold, awaiting the results of those DNA tests. I was very touched that he took the time and trouble to come all this way to tell me this in person. I guess my e-mail to him must have sounded pretty anguished, the way I feel right now.
Annasmom, I am also sitting on pins and needles, when I read DrDoogie's last post I had goosebumps all over me and the best feeling came over me. I don't post very often as I don't seem to have anything to contribute to the search but read nightly. Couldn't go to bed without checking on the progress in our search for Anna.So you can well imagine that my heart stopped when there was a knock at the door 45 minutes ago and I opened the door to find Detective Gilletti, who had driven from Redwood City through commute traffic to respond to my e-mail. He did not bring news, but rather wanted just to sit down in person and tell me about the phone calls and letters which have been going back and forth between his office, the Sheriff's office and the DOJ this past week. Right now, he is anxious to communicate to the DOJ and their forensic people that many lives are more or less on hold, awaiting the results of those DNA tests. I was very touched that he took the time and trouble to come all this way to tell me this in person. I guess my e-mail to him must have sounded pretty anguished, the way I feel right now.
My heart stopped just reading this first sentence. I am so glad that he seems understanding and supporting, which is what you need. None of us, unless we have been through what you have, and I sure never have, can even BEGIN to comprehend what you are going through right now. I personally, am in awe of you and how you have come through all of this!So you can well imagine that my heart stopped when there was a knock at the door 45 minutes ago and I opened the door to find Detective Gilletti,
We may not be able to immediately inform this forum until certain things occur, but we will of course share this information as soon as it is prudent to do so.