Searchfortruth
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2009
- Messages
- 5,971
- Reaction score
- 8
BBM.I've just finished reading all the news from 11/23. It's been a "you snooze, you lose" sort of day! I found this bit from today's TES motion.
One of the volunteers, Laura Buchanan, of New Jersey, submitted a sworn statement that may provide ammunition for Casey Anthony's defense.
In the statement, Buchanan wrote:
"On Sept. 3, 2008 I personally searched near the privacy fence and worked my way towards, and then the spot, where the body was found.
I did not notice anything unusual. I did not notice a strange smell. I noticed no buzzards, nor unusual animal or insect activity.
It is my opinion that the remains of Caylee Anthony were not there during the time of our search."
http://www.clickorlando.com/news/21704994/detail.html
There were a few things that bothered me about this statement (BBM).
First of all, by September 3, the body would have been completely skeletonized and there would be no buzzards or animal activity at that point.
As for the "unusual insect activity," again, there wouldn't be large hoards of blowflys in the area.
Finally, in early September, there was standing water in the area where the plastic bags were eventually found, as well as the remains. This searcher mentions nothing about wearing hip-waders to get through the water!
TM refused to go into any of the water-filled areas for fear of pushing the fragile remains down into the mud.
Most of the tiny bones found by LE in December were totally hidden by the dense undergrowth. This person might have found a recently deceased person, complete with buzzards and blowflys, not skeletal remains.
Laura (from New Jersey) "personally searched the area in September ? As in not with TES or a group...how convenient is that ?
In September the area was flooded and this "Laura" (and any other witnesses Jose digs up) are not going to be able to refute the pics showing the water and the testimony of Tim M and other TES searchers who were there.