Searchers and the Motion Regarding TES

[Spangle]

Didn't the court give the defense access to ALL the records? All they had to do was pay a babysitter to watch over them, while they go through them in a secure place. They were not allowed to take any thing or photos of the files. But if they found one they thought was important, they could bring it to the attention of the judge for him to review.

So what is the complaint? Since they are not being denied access, I dont' see how they will be able to use this on appeal.

 

[The World According]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raHlPVJEabU&feature=player_embedded[/ame]
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-P2NEQz17s&feature=player_embedded[/ame]
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UyMjA2XVRH4&feature=player_embedded[/ame]

 

[Kentjbkent]

Didn't the court give the defense access to ALL the records? All they had to do was pay a babysitter to watch over them, while they go through them in a secure place. They were not allowed to take any thing or photos of the files. But if they found one they thought was important, they could bring it to the attention of the judge for him to review.

So what is the complaint? Since they are not being denied access, I dont' see how they will be able to use this on appeal.

What I read on another forum (and trying to find that link again!) is that after JS ruled on the motion, JB/MN set up an appointment to meet in MN office to view records, but later cancelled the meeting and has yet to reschedule it.

It was stated that TM filed the motion to continue in order to give JB one more opportunity to schedule a time to come view the records to avoid dragging this back into court?

 

[ExpectingUnicorns]

What I read on another forum (and trying to find that link again!) is that after JS ruled on the motion, JB/MN set up an appointment to meet in MN office to view records, but later cancelled the meeting and has yet to reschedule it.

It was stated that TM filed the motion to continue in order to give JB one more opportunity to schedule a time to come view the records to avoid dragging this back into court?

You are right, Kentjbkent!

"The compromise, ruled the judge, is to allow Casey's defense access to search records at the law office of Mark NeJame (lawyer for Equusearch).

If they find additional searchers that were in the immediate proximity of where Caylee's remains were found they can present the evidence to the court. The judge will then determine "materiality, relevance and possible disclosure. "

Equusearch must hand over the records of the 32 previously mentions volunteer immediately."

http://www.nejamelaw.com/mark-nejame-in-the-news/judge-rules-on-texas-equusearch-records.htm

Haven't found anything on the cancelled appointment yet, but will keep looking.