I think they said they can't date blood on the wall, or something to that effect... think it was Juan himself that said, the best evidence to place her, were in fact the photos. There was hair with the follicle attached but they really liked the foot and time stamps she left behind.
This is an article I found on the subject of dating blood:
http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/Ne...-technique.asp
BTW, he sounds so happy. I can't believe the grade school reference to his height was 'a thing' (I figured a few under-educated mishaps attempted to smear him, didn't realize he received as much 'flak' as he did).
And his voice? Or that he made 'the poor killer' cry on stand in attempt to catch her in one of her lies lest her release/possible parole. I haven't met a prosecutor (or lawyer) who wasn't 'elaborate' in court anyway. I think the mass of the public who has gone to something as small as traffic court to see a judge or plea with lawyers in the very least, knows this. These county representatives will fight tooth and nail for something like a speeding infraction - I don't think they care if you 'namecall' them after said grade school... ??
And what about all the stuff the 'dream team' did to the victim? For what? I heard like perhaps two sins he may have committed in regards to faithfulness and his general 'weakness for lust' (oh no, a 30 year old male wants to find his mate), nothing that remotely reflected him as a domestic abuser. WTF, she wasn't even invited into his domain!
Juan has always been that type-A 'Jack McCoy' as far as I am concerned. Muwahaha, I don't think either one of them were fond of computers.
I got a kick out of the part he mentioned he may have uttered an 'expletive' when visiting her in prison (magazine scam).
I wasn't expecting any websleuthers to get honorable mentions! Wow, way to go Hope and pocket...!!