LinasK
Verified insider- Mark Dribin case
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2004
- Messages
- 26,997
- Reaction score
- 25,521
I will always wonder if the killer might not have gotten a life with possibility of parole sentence had she not claimed self defense, not taken the stand, not tried to make Travis the villain...but instead had come clean about her guilt and shown remorse. Even if her psychopathy does not understand the concept of remorse...it does understand being able to act, to manipulate, to con. She could have very well faked remorse well enough to be believed by many people...not most people, but many more than had ever been in her camp or even on the fence. I cannot completely negate the possibility that the judge might have allowed for release one day has this killer conducted herself differently and had her defense been put to the court differently. Killer needed to show contrition at every opportunity, with her defense team constantly pointing out those showings.
I agree with everyone that it would always have been a verdict of first degree murder...but I think the sentence could have turned out differently.
I don't think so because of the degree of overkill. She killed him 3 different ways. Because of the viciousness of the kill- this was NO self-defense, she is someone who shouldn't get out after a few years of good behavior. The only real difference between her and Leslie Van Houten is that she didn't have a Charles Manson influencing her.