Meyer wasn't 'ambivalent' about anything. He is a coroner. His job is to record the EFFECTS primarily -- namely, what the body conditions are.That's what Meyer did -- recorded the state he found JonBenet's body in. At no point did he say that molestation was a lie. Indeed, the majority of people who have analysed his findings of the autopsy report have stated quite clearly that the findings indicate that JonBenet was both chronically and acutely molested. That's not speculation.
Have you actually read the autopsy? JonBenet's injuries could not have been accidental. They were deliberate injuries inflicted from a sick b*stard who was molesting her.
There's several options :
1. JonBenet was molested by an intruder who caused the acute injuries. This intruder, on a prior day also caused the chronic injuries.
2. JonBenet was molested by an intruder who caused the acute injuries but who did not cause the chronic ones.
3. A family member molested JonBenet causing both the chronic and acute injuries.
4.A family member molested JonBenet causing the chronic injuries but not the acute ones.
Apply occom's razor. There is no evidence for an intruder on the night of the 25th/26th. Thus, if no intruder was in the house, that means JonBenet's acute injuries could not have been caused by them. Thus, we can dismiss scenario 1 + 2. That leaves scenario's 3+4. Since we know that ONLY family members were in the house that night it means that it is probable that the injuries JonBenet sustained were caused by one of the people in the house. Since her injuries were related i.e the acute related to the chronic, we can also assume the same person did them.Thus, we can dismiss scenario 4.
That leaves scenario 3 -- the same person who caused the acute injuries also caused the chronic ones. Indeed, JonBenet was chronically and acutely abused.
When you can explain why a six year old girl has an eroded hymen, a vaginal opening twice the normal size, internal scarring, birefringent material in her genitals and clear signs of abuse in the 7 o'clock position -- whilst also explaining why fibres from her father's shirt were in her underwear, underwear applied AFTER she died, then your views will have some merit.
Again you talk about people analising mayers Autopsy, this is their opinion Not mayers, at no stage did mayers say in his opinion there was prolonged prior sexual abuse, certainly not any Autopsy I HAVE SEEN.
An ERODED HYMEN is not INDICITIVE OF SEXUAL ABUSE, it is merely one of several reasons, as stated before, please read : my previous post on this.
In regard to jb Vaginal size? where is your evidence for this, i see
the uterus are consistent with the prepubescent ages. The ovary is unremarkable
On the anterior aspect of the perineum, along the edges of closure of the labia majora, is a small amount of dried blood. A similar small amount of dried and semifluid blood is present on the skin of the fourchette and in the vestibule. Inside the vestibule of the vagina and along the distal vaginal wall is reddish hyperemia. This hyperemia is circumferential and perhaps more noticeable on the right side and posteriorly. The hyperemia also appears to extend just inside the vaginal orifice. A 1 cm red-purple area of abrasion is located on the right posterolateral area of the 1x1 cm hymenal orifice. The hymen itself is represented by a rim of mucosal tissue extending clockwise between the 2 and 10:00 positions. The area of abrasion is present at approximately the 7:00 position and appears to involve the hymen and distal right lateral vaginal wall and possibly the area anterior to the hymen. On the right labia majora is a very faint area of violet discoloration measuring approximately one inch by three-eighths of an inch. Incision into the underlying subcutaneous tissue discloses no hemorrhage. A minimal amount of semiliquid thin watery red fluid is present in the vaginal vault. No recent or remote anal or other perineal trauma is identified
Genitalia: The upper portions of the vaginal vault contain no abnormalities. The prepubescent uterus measures 3 x 1 x 0.8cm and is unremarkable. The cervial os contains no abnormalities. Both fallopian tubes and ovaries are prepubescent and unremarkable by gross examination.
Vaginal Mucosa: All of the sections contain vascular congestion and focal interstitial chronic inflammation. The smallest piece of tissue, from the 7:00 position of the vaginal wall/hymen, contains epithelial erosion with underlying capillary congestion. A small number of red blood cells is present on the eroded surface, as is birefringent foreign material. Acute inflammatory infiltrate is not seen
Now tell me where you see any positive actual evidence of Mayer suggesting Prior sexual abuse.
AS for fibre evidence, come on now you must know at least a little about fibre transfer, any fibres belonging to the ramseys had a perfectly legitimate reason for being on or around JB, she was in close contact with these people and there fibres were present everywhere as would yours in your house, or anybody's house you frequented.Where Found.
"a Caucasian "pubic or auxiliary" hair was found on the blanket covering JonBenet's body. (SMF P 179; PSMF P 179.) The hair does not match that of any Ramsey and has not been sourced. (SMF P 180; PSMF P 180.)" (Carnes 2003:22). Do you hear me saying HEY THEY FOUND A PUBIC HAIR UNMATCHED TO ANY RAMSEY?
No, because it is only a possibility, nothing is certain in this case, and unlike you i am not arrogant enough to believe this is a cut and dried case.
anic: and you're starting to become rude.