Since there was no mention in the autopsy report of any red staining on the outer aspect of the crotch of the panties, does that imply that there was insufficient blood to penetrate the panties or that the panties were impenetrable by design (crotch was absorbent)?
Which occurred first? Did she urinate first or bleed first? If she bled first, then why didn't the urine (in much greater quantity, I assume) diffuse the blood and/or cause it to migrate through the fabric such that it would be visible to the naked eye on the outer aspect of the crotch of the panties, and possibly even on the inner aspect of the crotch of the longjohns? I know for a fact that urine dissolves blood.
That apparently no such migration occurred leads me to believe that urination occurred first and was followed, after some sufficient period of time, by the bleeding. I have postulated hereinbefore that the bleeding occurred when the body was picked up (moved) by John, the blood having first coagulated in the vault and vestibule, then re-liquified with time, permitting it to flow when subjected to the force of gravity. Perhaps, during the process of being transported out of the basement and up to the stairs to the foyer, there was enough movement (jostling) of the pelvic area and it's wrapping (the underwear) to produce several red areas of staining, not just one.
There are only a very limited number of plausible explanations for the several red areas. Steady bleeding from a motionless body would not produce them; it would produce only one red area. Motion (movement) of the panties relative to the body could produce several distinct (separate) red areas if the bleeding were minimal, which it apparently was-not a steady flow, but an intermittent flow; i.e., drips.
Is it possible that the urine stain on the panties was due to transfer from the longjohns, the unstained panties having been installed prior to re-installation of the wet longjohns? If this was not the case, then my hypothesis regarding the wiping and redressing may not be correct. Recall that I postulated that she had first been sexually injured, had bled, had been wiped and had undergone a change of panties (the too-big ones) and had subsequently urinated. It would not have been necessary-to validate my hypothesis, that the longjohns be wet prior to that time. However, if that was not the case, then it would be necessary that urination occur after the sexual injury but without washing any blood (assuming it was present) out of the vaginal area. I think the female anatomy would allow for this, but I won't go into that discussion, in order to avoid upsetting Miss Daisey.
"JonBenet's longjohn's had a urine stain on the front - which would mean, if releasing urine upon death, she died on her stomach." Very good point and one with which I'd agree. The release would be slow and the body would be motionless.
"The oversized panties were stained with urine as well...mixed with a spot of blood." I'm not sure this is true, that the urine and the blood were mixed. Some mixing may have occurred due to blood having been deposited upon the urine-stained area. The coroner didn't say that the blood had co-mingled with the urine prior to (or during) it's deposition.
"Wouldn't this mean that JonBenet was NOT "redressed" after the murder - but before? If after the murder, wouldn't the oversized panties be dry? Especially if wiped down before the redressing." Excellent observation and one with which I heartily agree.
"So, if the "wiping down" happen before the oversized panties were put on - then was JonBenet still alive when "wiped down" and "redressed." YES, YES, YES.
"The blood was mixed with urine, so the molestation could have taken place within the redressing period. At that point, wouldn't JonBenet still be alive?" Agree except with respect to your characterization of blood mixed with urine.
"The oversized panties were in her bedroom - doesn't it make more sense that the redressing occurred in her bedroom - as to the killer running upstairs (while JonBenet still alive), pulling out the drawer and picking "Wednesday" - to run back down the stairs to redress her body in the cellar." Makes perfect sense to me.
"There was never a matching urine stain found (on floor, bedding, etc.) that I know of... So where, on her stomach, did JonBenet die? Where is the urine stain?" VERY good question!
__________________
